Global Xtreme v. Advanced Aircraft Center
Decided September 25, 2013; docket 3D12-2220. Full nine-page opinion retrieved in Justia’s unofficial reproduction; generated summaries were not used.
Source note (2026-10-18):
- Links on this page to
https://static.case.law/so3d/122/cases/0487-01.jsonare an (unofficial Caselaw Access Project copy, retrieved before 2026-10-18; host disallows automated access); no official or otherwise permitted full-text copy was located on 2026-10-18.
Facts
An aircraft repair dispute produced a lien-foreclosure counterclaim and fee award.
Holding and reasoning
Reversed: section 713.29’s construction-lien fee entitlement did not extend to the personalty/aircraft provisions. The separate sanctions award also lacked the required motion-service evidence and safe-harbor compliance.
Practical impact
Do not import construction-lien fees into aircraft repair litigation. This appeal did not establish a general buyer-title or lien-priority rule.
Good-law status
Comprehensive later treatment remains unverified.
Applies in →
Legal information, not legal advice.
Independent Primary-Text Comparison — 2026-10-17
No universal personalty attorney-fee entitlement; current statute compared without converting a fee appeal into a title or priority holding. Current operative comparison: § 713.29; § 57.105. Full holding verification is not a comprehensive still-good-law certificate. Where the former source URL failed, the working full-opinion source now appears in metadata; original failed receipts remain separate in the review evidence.
Legal information, not legal advice. Verify against the cited primary sources and consult a licensed Florida attorney before acting.