Indiana — Tax & Mortgage Foreclosure
Legal information, not legal advice. Verify against the cited primary sources before acting. Last verified: 2026-06-01.
Indiana is a tax-lien-certificate state. The county treasurer certifies a delinquency list; the county auditor runs an annual public auction (between August 1 and November 1) where investors buy a certificate of sale subject to the owner’s right of redemption (IC 6-1.1-24). If the owner does not redeem within the statutory period (generally one year), the certificate holder may petition for a tax deed under IC 6-1.1-25 after satisfying strict notice requirements. Indiana’s overbid (amount above the minimum bid) is deposited in a tax sale surplus fund that belongs to the former owner of record — so Indiana was largely compliant with tyler-v-hennepin-county before 2023, because it already returns surplus equity rather than retaining it. Indiana is also notable for a statutory 10% fee cap and Attorney-General enforcement on third-party surplus-recovery agreements (IC 6-1.1-24-7.5), which directly governs surplus recovery operators.
0. Identity & Classification
- Recording unit: county (count: 92). Source (official SBOA County Treasurer’s Manual, tax-sale chapter): https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Tax sale type: tax_lien_certificate — buyer receives a certificate of sale, not a deed; deed issues only after the redemption period expires and notice/petition under IC 6-1.1-25. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/CH-4-Taxation,-Tax-Sale-and-Redemption,-and-Personal-Property-Tax-Levy-and-Sale.pdf
- Tax foreclosure process: judicial / administrative hybrid — the county auditor/treasurer apply to a court for a judgment and order of sale before the auction (IC 6-1.1-24-4.6, 6-1.1-24-4.7), then the certificate holder petitions the court for the tax deed (IC 6-1.1-25-4.6). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Mortgage foreclosure process: judicial (decree of foreclosure + sheriff’s sale; IC 32-29-7). Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-32/article-29/chapter-7/
- Selling authority: county auditor (conducts the tax sale; IC 6-1.1-24-5) with the county treasurer (delinquency certification, funds). Mortgage sales: county sheriff.
- Statutory home: Title 6, Art. 1.1, Ch. 24 (Sale of Real Property When Taxes Become Delinquent) and Ch. 25 (Redemption and Tax Deeds); mortgage foreclosure at IC 32-29-7. Justia mirror of Ch. 25 (current): https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/ ; Ch. 32-29-7: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-32/article-29/chapter-7/
- Tyler v. Hennepin compliance: compliant — IC 6-1.1-24-7 deposits the amount by which the bid exceeds the judgment/minimum bid into a tax sale surplus fund and lets the divested owner of record file a verified claim; the state does not keep the equity. Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/ (text confirmed via search of the current IC 6-1.1-24-7).
1. Tax Sale Mechanics
- What is sold: a certificate of sale (lien certificate). The purchaser’s lien is superior to all liens existing when the certificate is issued (IC 6-1.1-24-9). Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-24/section-6-1-1-24-9/
- Bidding method: premium / highest-bid — property is sold “to the highest bidder at public auction,” subject to the right of redemption (IC 6-1.1-24-5). The amount bid above the minimum becomes the overbid/surplus. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Interest / penalty (redemption “penalty”): structured as a redemption premium, not a bid-down interest rate — 110% of the minimum bid if redeemed within 6 months, 115% if redeemed after 6 months (IC 6-1.1-25-2). Source (SBOA manual quoting the statute): https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Interest on overbid and on subsequent taxes: VERIFIED 5% per annum (for sales after June 30, 2014) on (a) the amount by which the purchase price exceeds the minimum bid and (b) taxes/special assessments the purchaser pays after the sale (IC 6-1.1-25-2(c)–(d)). NOTE: the archived 2002 SBOA manual states 10% per annum — that pre-amendment rate is superseded; the current rate is 5%. Current-rate source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/ (text of IC 6-1.1-25-2). 2002 manual (historical): https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Minimum bid composition: delinquent taxes + special assessments + penalties + interest + costs of sale (including title search/notice costs and prior unpaid tax-sale costs) (IC 6-1.1-24-5, 6-1.1-24-2). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Sale frequency / typical month: annual; the sale “must take place on or after August 1 and before November 1 of each year” (IC 6-1.1-24-5). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Venue: both in-person and online; many counties use electronic auction platforms. Source (platform vendor): [see needs_verification — confirm statewide vendor against an official county/auditor source].
- Platform vendors: SRI Incorporated and GUTS/government-utilities vendors are commonly used by Indiana counties. [see needs_verification — confirm against official county sources].
- Registration & deposit: bidders register with the auditor; ineligible/barred-purchaser certifications apply (IC 6-1.1-24-5.1, 6-1.1-24-5.3); a person who owes delinquent taxes on Indiana property (or their agent) may not bid (IC 6-1.1-24-5.3). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Subsequent taxes (“subs”): taxes/special assessments the certificate holder pays after the sale are added to the redemption amount plus 5% per annum (IC 6-1.1-25-2(d)). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
2. Right of Redemption → see right-of-redemption
- Pre-sale right: exists — the owner may pay the delinquency and remove the parcel from the sale any time before sale; partial-payment arrangements can also remove a parcel (IC 6-1.1-24-1.2). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Post-sale period: generally one (1) year after the date of sale of the certificate (IC 6-1.1-25-4). Shorter 120-day periods apply when (a) the county executive acquires a lien under IC 6-1.1-24-6 and the certificate is not resold, or (b) the certificate is assigned to a political subdivision / the property is acquired by a qualified urban-redevelopment agency. Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/section-6-1-1-25-4/ (search-confirmed). Manual corroboration: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Runs from: the date of the tax sale (date of sale of the certificate). Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/section-6-1-1-25-4/
- Who may redeem: any person — owner, occupant, mortgagee, or other person with a substantial property interest of public record. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/CH-4-Taxation,-Tax-Sale-and-Redemption,-and-Personal-Property-Tax-Levy-and-Sale.pdf
- Redemption amount formula: 110% of minimum bid (≤6 months) or 115% (>6 months) + the overbid (purchase price minus minimum bid) + 5%/yr on the overbid + taxes/special assessments paid by the purchaser after sale + 5%/yr on those taxes + statutory costs (title search, notice, attorney fees) under IC 6-1.1-25-2(e). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Premium to certificate holder: the 10%/15% premium on the minimum bid plus 5%/yr on the overbid and on subs (the “penalty/interest” the redeeming owner pays the holder). Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/
- Procedure: redemption money is paid to the county treasurer, receipted into the “tax sale redemption” fund; the auditor endorses and preserves the certificate (IC 6-1.1-25-3). The certificate holder then files a verified claim to recover the redemption money plus penalty/interest. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/CH-4-Taxation,-Tax-Sale-and-Redemption,-and-Personal-Property-Tax-Levy-and-Sale.pdf
- Extinguishment: the right of redemption is cut off by issuance of the tax deed after the redemption period expires and the IC 6-1.1-25-4.5/4.6 notices and court petition are completed. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Special tolling: the redemption period (and surplus-claim deadline) is extended if extended under federal bankruptcy law (IC 6-1.1-24-7). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/ . Minors/incompetents/SCRA: [see needs_verification].
3. Surplus / Excess Proceeds → see surplus-funds, third-party-recovery-rules
- Belongs to: former owner (the “owner of record of the real property at the time the tax deed is issued who is divested of ownership by the issuance of a tax deed”), or the certificate purchaser/assignee upon redemption (IC 6-1.1-24-7). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/
- Claim waterfall (application of the bid): the purchaser’s payment is applied first to taxes/special assessments/penalties/interest/costs (the judgment/minimum bid), then the excess (“amount by which the purchase price exceeds the minimum bid”) is deposited into the tax sale surplus fund (IC 6-1.1-24-7; for county-resold certificates, IC 6-1.1-24-6.4). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/
- Filing venue: verified claim filed with the county auditor; approved jointly by the county auditor and county treasurer, who issue a warrant to the claimant (IC 6-1.1-24-7). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/
- Claim deadline: three (3) years after the date the surplus is received; unclaimed funds are transferred to the county general fund and may not thereafter be disbursed (unless the redemption period was extended under federal bankruptcy law) (IC 6-1.1-24-7). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/
- Escheat: functions as a transfer to the county general fund at 3 years (not state escheat); not reclaimable after transfer. Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/
- Documentation required: verified claim establishing identity as divested owner of record (or redeeming purchaser/assignee); proof of ownership/interest. [see needs_verification — link a live county surplus claim form].
- Third-party recovery (IC 6-1.1-24-7.5):
- fee_cap_pct: 10% — an agreement entered on or after May 1, 2010 whose primary purpose is paying compensation to locate/recover money in the tax sale surplus fund is valid only if compensation is not more than 10% of the amount collected (unless the amount collected is $50 or less). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7-5/
- licensing_required: [see needs_verification — no specific surplus-recovery license confirmed; note generic provisions].
- assignment_of_claim_allowed: certificates are assignable (IC 6-1.1-24-9); assignability of the surplus claim itself via a recovery agreement is permitted but capped/regulated by IC 6-1.1-24-7.5. Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7-5/
- cooling_off_period: [see needs_verification].
- contract_disclosure_rules: the agreement must disclose the amount deposited in the tax sale surplus fund and the owner’s net share after compensation (IC 6-1.1-24-7.5). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7-5/
- prohibited_practices: unconscionable compensation; agreements exceeding the cap are unenforceable; the Attorney General (Homeowner Protection Unit, IC 4-6-12) enforces and may seek civil penalties and investigation costs. Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7-5/
- citation: IC 6-1.1-24-7.5; general unclaimed-property finder cap also 10% (IC 32-34-1-46 / Revised Unclaimed Property Act). https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7-5/
- Notice to former owner required: yes — the tax-sale notice must state that, if the property sells for more than the minimum bid and is not redeemed, the divested owner of record may have a right to the tax sale surplus (IC 6-1.1-24-2 notice contents). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
4. Mortgage Foreclosure
- Process: judicial — complaint, decree of foreclosure, sheriff’s sale (IC 32-29-7). Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-32/article-29/chapter-7/
- Timeline: process for a sale may not issue for 3 months after the foreclosure complaint is filed (IC 32-29-7-3); a borrower may agree to waive the 3-month period, but if waived the lender cannot obtain a deficiency judgment. After the waiting period the lender praecipes for sale; the sheriff advertises and sells. Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-32-property/in-code-sect-32-29-7-3/
- Reinstatement right: [see needs_verification — Indiana has no general statutory reinstatement right; typically governed by loan contract / federal (FHA) servicing rules].
- Redemption after sale: none — “every sale” under the chapter is without right of redemption; there is no statutory post-sale redemption after a mortgage foreclosure (IC 32-29-7-13). The owner/part-owner may redeem before the sheriff’s sale by paying the judgment, interest, and costs to the clerk/sheriff (IC 32-29-7-7). Source: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-32/article-29/chapter-7/section-32-29-7-7/
- Deficiency judgment: allowed; barred only where the borrower waived the 3-month sale-delay with the lender’s consent (IC 32-29-7-3). Source: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-32-property/in-code-sect-32-29-7-3/
- Surplus distribution: sheriff’s-sale proceeds pay costs, then the judgment, then junior liens by priority, then residue to the owner (general foreclosure-sale distribution under IC 32-29-7). [see needs_verification — pin exact subsection].
- Sale officer: sheriff.
5. Sale Procedure Playbooks
- Tax sale (auditor) — ordered steps → see treasurer-sale:
- Treasurer certifies the delinquency list; auditor prepares notice (IC 6-1.1-24-1, -2). https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Auditor posts notice in a public county building ≥21 days before the earliest judgment date and publishes it; mails certified notice to the owner (and to mortgagees who annually request it) ≥21 days before judgment (IC 6-1.1-24-3, -4). https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Auditor/treasurer apply to the court for judgment and order of sale; defenses must be filed by the date set in the notice; court enters judgment ≤3 days before the advertised sale (IC 6-1.1-24-4.6, -4.7). https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Public auction to the highest bidder, subject to redemption, between Aug 1 and Nov 1 (IC 6-1.1-24-5).
- Buyer pays; auditor issues a certificate of sale (IC 6-1.1-24-9); overbid → surplus fund (IC 6-1.1-24-7).
- Redemption period (1 year, or 120 days) runs; if no redemption, holder gives IC 6-1.1-25-4.5 notice and petitions the court for a tax deed (IC 6-1.1-25-4.6).
- Sheriff sale (mortgage) — ordered steps → see sheriff-sale:
- Foreclosure complaint; 3-month wait (IC 32-29-7-3). 2. Decree; praecipe; sheriff advertises. 3. Owner may redeem before sale (IC 32-29-7-7). 4. Sheriff’s sale; no post-sale redemption (IC 32-29-7-13). https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-32/article-29/chapter-7/
- Notice requirements (tax sale): publication (per IC 5-3-1) + posting ≥21 days + certified mail, return receipt requested to owners (and requesting mortgagees) ≥21 days before the judgment application; pre-deed notices under IC 6-1.1-25-4.5 (to owner/those with a substantial interest) and IC 6-1.1-25-4.6 (petition to court). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Upset bid / confirmation: no upset-bid window; the court enters judgment/order of sale before the auction and later adjudicates the tax-deed petition (IC 6-1.1-25-4.6). Mortgage sheriff sales are subject to court oversight, not an upset-bid period. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf
- Payment terms: tax-sale buyer must immediately pay the bid amount on the day of sale; failure to pay triggers IC 6-1.1-24-8 penalties. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/CH-4-Taxation,-Tax-Sale-and-Redemption,-and-Personal-Property-Tax-Levy-and-Sale.pdf
- Deed issued: tax deed (IC 6-1.1-25-5 form), issued by court order/auditor after the petition (IC 6-1.1-25-4.6); recorded by the county auditor (IC 6-1.1-25-20). It is not a warranty deed. Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/Appendix-to-Indiana-Codes-County-Treasurer-Manual.pdf
6. Due Process & Notice → see due-process-notice
- Standard: Mullane “reasonably calculated” notice, applied through Indiana’s statutory mailed-notice + publication scheme; where certified mail is returned undeliverable, the auditor/purchaser must take additional reasonable steps (Jones v. Flowers), including searching the county’s own records for a better address. Source (Indiana Supreme Court, Crowe): https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2023/10/16/crowe-v-savvy-in-llc-no-23s-tp-00090-__-n-e-3d-__-ind-oct-11-2023/
- Required attempts: publication; posting; certified mail (return receipt) to the owner and to mortgagees who annually request notice (IC 6-1.1-24-3, -4); pre-deed mailed notice under IC 6-1.1-25-4.5. The annual-request requirement is constitutional: although the Court of Appeals had held that due process requires pre-sale mailed notice to a mortgagee even without an annual request, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed, holding that conditioning a mortgagee’s mailed notice on its statutory annual request does not violate Fourteenth Amendment due process (m-and-m-investment-group-v-ahlemeyer-farms, 994 N.E.2d 1108 (Ind. 2013)). Source: https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2013/09/27/mm-v-ahlemeyer/
- Consequence of defective notice: voidable — a tax deed may be set aside if the required notices were not given in substantial compliance, or if notice was constitutionally inadequate. But the bar is high: where the auditor mails simultaneous certified + first-class notice to the deed address and the first-class mailing is not returned undeliverable, notice is adequate and the auditor is not obligated to search its own internal records for a better address (indiana-land-trust-v-xl-investment-properties, 155 N.E.3d 1177 (Ind. 2020), affirming denial of the motion to set aside the deed). The “search your own records” duty arises under jones-v-flowers only when mail is actually returned undeliverable. Source (Indiana Supreme Court): https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2023/10/16/crowe-v-savvy-in-llc-no-23s-tp-00090-__-n-e-3d-__-ind-oct-11-2023/
- Leading cases: crowe-v-savvy-in, indiana-land-trust-v-xl-investment-properties, m-and-m-investment-group-v-ahlemeyer-farms, mullane-v-central-hanover, jones-v-flowers, mennonite-v-adams.
7. Title & Marketability
- Deed warranty level: none — a tax deed conveys the interest foreclosed, without warranty covenants. IC 6-1.1-25-5 prescribes the form; the deed is presumptive evidence of regularity (IC 6-1.1-24-11). Source: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/Appendix-to-Indiana-Codes-County-Treasurer-Manual.pdf
- Marketable immediately? Generally no as a practical matter; quiet-title is commonly used to make the title insurable. Tax-sale purchasers frequently file a quiet-title action (as in indiana-land-trust-v-xl-investment-properties, where the Ind. Supreme Court ultimately upheld the deed against a notice challenge, Ind. 2020). Source: https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2023/10/16/crowe-v-savvy-in-llc-no-23s-tp-00090-__-n-e-3d-__-ind-oct-11-2023/
- Quiet title required? Commonly pursued in practice for insurable title. [see needs_verification — title-insurer practice citation].
- SOL to challenge deed: a motion to set aside / petition contesting the tax deed is time-limited; the period for challenging on notice grounds is litigated case-by-case (see indiana-land-trust-v-xl-investment-properties, addressing a notice-based set-aside motion). [see needs_verification — pin the exact statutory limitations period under IC 6-1.1-25-4.6/16].
- Title insurance availability: available after curative steps (quiet title); varies by underwriter. [see needs_verification].
- Common defects: defective/constitutionally inadequate notice to owner or mortgagee; failure to search the auditor’s own records after returned mail; bankruptcy stay; unredeemed federal tax lien (120-day federal redemption); unknown heirs.
8. Case Law (real, verified)
| Case | Year | Topic | Holding (plain English) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| crowe-v-savvy-in | 2023 | due_process / redemption / sale_procedure | Ind. Supreme Court (No. 23S-TP-90): tax-sale purchaser’s certified + first-class mailed notices satisfied due process and IC 6-1.1-25 because none were returned undeliverable, so no “additional reasonable steps” were required under Jones v. Flowers; purchaser entitled to the tax deeds. Reversed the COA’s equitable extra-redemption grant. | https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2023/10/16/crowe-v-savvy-in-llc-no-23s-tp-00090-__-n-e-3d-__-ind-oct-11-2023/ |
| indiana-land-trust-v-xl-investment-properties | 2020 | due_process / sale_procedure | Ind. Supreme Court (20S-MI-62, 155 N.E.3d 1177): good law. The LaPorte County Auditor’s simultaneous certified + first-class mailed notice to the deed address was adequate and reasonably calculated under mullane-v-central-hanover; because the first-class mail was not returned undeliverable, the auditor was NOT required to search its own internal records for a better address. The Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the motion to set aside the tax deed. (This reverses the 2019 Court of Appeals result, which had set the deed aside on a “search your own records” theory — that COA holding is no longer good law.) | https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2023/10/16/crowe-v-savvy-in-llc-no-23s-tp-00090-__-n-e-3d-__-ind-oct-11-2023/ |
| m-and-m-investment-group-v-ahlemeyer-farms | 2013 | due_process | Ind. Supreme Court (03S04-1211-CC-645, 994 N.E.2d 1108 (Ind. Sept. 26, 2013)): good law. Conditioning a mortgagee’s pre-sale mailed notice on the mortgagee’s statutory annual request under IC 6-1.1-24-3(b) does NOT violate the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. The Court reversed the 2012 Court of Appeals opinion (and the trial court), which had held the annual-request scheme unconstitutional and required mailed notice to a non-requesting mortgagee — that COA holding is reversed and no longer good law. Practical effect: a mortgagee that fails to file the annual request bears the risk of not receiving mailed tax-sale notice. | https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2013/09/27/mm-v-ahlemeyer/ |
| tyler-v-hennepin-county | 2023 | surplus | U.S. Supreme Court (598 U.S. 631): government retention of surplus equity above the tax debt is an unconstitutional taking. Indiana already returns the overbid to the divested owner via the IC 6-1.1-24-7 surplus fund, so Indiana’s scheme is consistent with Tyler. | https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-166_8n59.pdf |
Topic coverage: due_process ✓ (Crowe; Indiana Land Trust; M&M), redemption ✓ (Crowe — redemption-period notice/extension), sale_procedure ✓ (Crowe; Indiana Land Trust — tax-deed issuance procedure), surplus ✓ (Tyler — doctrine; Indiana statute already compliant). A surplus claim adjudicated under Indiana law is flagged in needs_verification to add an in-state surplus case.
9. Edge Cases (state-specific notes)
- bankruptcy-automatic-stay — A pending Indiana tax sale/sheriff sale is stayed by 11 U.S.C. §362; IC 6-1.1-24-7 expressly extends the surplus-claim/redemption window where the redemption period is extended under federal bankruptcy law. https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/
- federal-tax-lien-redemption — IRS holds a 120-day post-sale redemption right (26 U.S.C. §7425); junior federal liens require IRS notice. [federal, cross-jurisdiction].
- heirs-property — Inherited/unknown-heir interests are a frequent notice-defect ground for challenging tax deeds, though the bar to set a deed aside is high after indiana-land-trust-v-xl-investment-properties (Ind. 2020): notice to the address of record is adequate when mail is not returned undeliverable. https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2023/10/16/crowe-v-savvy-in-llc-no-23s-tp-00090-__-n-e-3d-__-ind-oct-11-2023/
- mortgagee-redemption — Indiana-specific: mortgagees of record may redeem, but a mortgagee receives mailed pre-sale notice only if it files the statutory annual request under IC 6-1.1-24-3(b). The Indiana Supreme Court held that this annual-request condition does NOT violate due process (m-and-m-investment-group-v-ahlemeyer-farms, 994 N.E.2d 1108 (Ind. 2013), reversing the contrary Court of Appeals opinion). A mortgagee that fails to file the request annually risks losing its interest at tax sale without mailed notice. https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2013/09/27/mm-v-ahlemeyer/
- surplus-recovery-fee-cap — Indiana-specific: third-party surplus-recovery agreements are capped at 10% with mandatory disclosure and Attorney-General enforcement (IC 6-1.1-24-7.5). https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7-5/
- deficiency-judgment — Indiana-specific: deficiency allowed unless the borrower waived the 3-month sale delay (IC 32-29-7-3). https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-32-property/in-code-sect-32-29-7-3/
- manufactured-homes — Delinquent mobile-home personal-property taxes are collected/sold under IC 6-1.1-23.5, with its own surplus fund. https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-23-5/section-6-1-1-23-5-15/
10. Operations
- Where records live: county auditor (tax-sale conduct, certificates, tax deeds, surplus fund, recording of tax deeds), county treasurer (delinquency, redemption funds, surplus warrants), county recorder (deeds/mortgages), clerk of the circuit court (tax-sale judgment, tax-deed petitions, mortgage foreclosure), county sheriff (mortgage sales).
- Public access urls: Indiana Code (official, JS app) — https://iga.in.gov/laws/2024/ic/titles/6 ; current Ch. 25 mirror — https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/ ; SBOA County Treasurer’s Manual (tax sale) — https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf ; Indiana Courts case opinions — https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/ ; Indiana Unclaimed Property — https://www.indianaunclaimed.gov/app/ucp-law
- Typical costs: minimum bid (taxes + assessments + penalties + interest + costs); redemption at 110%/115% of minimum bid + 5%/yr on overbid and subs + statutory notice/title/attorney costs; surplus and redemption claims are filed free with the county auditor/treasurer.
- Typical timelines: sale Aug 1–Nov 1; redemption 1 year (or 120 days); tax deed after notice + court petition (IC 6-1.1-25-4.6); surplus claim within 3 years of receipt (IC 6-1.1-24-7); mortgage sale ≥3 months after complaint (IC 32-29-7-3).
- Key agencies: County Auditor, County Treasurer, County Recorder, Clerk of the Circuit Court, County Sheriff, Indiana Attorney General Homeowner Protection Unit (surplus-recovery enforcement), Indiana State Board of Accounts (forms).
- Useful forms: SBOA-prescribed tax-sale notice form (IC 6-1.1-24-2/-4); verified surplus claim to county auditor (IC 6-1.1-24-7); tax-deed form (IC 6-1.1-25-5). [see needs_verification — link a live county claim/notice form].
11. Meta
- sources:
- {type: official_manual, url: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/County-Treasurers-Manual-Chapter-8-2002.pdf, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: official_manual, url: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/CH-4-Taxation,-Tax-Sale-and-Redemption,-and-Personal-Property-Tax-Levy-and-Sale.pdf, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: official_manual, url: https://www.in.gov/sboa/files/Appendix-to-Indiana-Codes-County-Treasurer-Manual.pdf, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-25/section-6-1-1-25-4/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-24/section-6-1-1-24-9/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-6-taxation/in-code-sect-6-1-1-24-7-5/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-32/article-29/chapter-7/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-32/article-29/chapter-7/section-32-29-7-7/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://codes.findlaw.com/in/title-32-property/in-code-sect-32-29-7-3/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: statute, url: https://law.justia.com/codes/indiana/title-6/article-1-1/chapter-23-5/section-6-1-1-23-5-15/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: case, url: https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2023/10/16/crowe-v-savvy-in-llc-no-23s-tp-00090-__-n-e-3d-__-ind-oct-11-2023/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: case, note: “M&M v. Ahlemeyer Farms — Ind. Supreme Court reversal, 994 N.E.2d 1108 (Ind. 2013): annual-request requirement constitutional”, url: https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2013/09/27/mm-v-ahlemeyer/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: case, note: “Indiana Land Trust v. XL — Ind. Supreme Court affirmance, 155 N.E.3d 1177 (Ind. 2020): auditor notice adequate, no duty to search internal records”, url: https://taxlawopinions.justia.com/category/supreme-court-of-indiana/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: case, note: “SUPERSEDED — 2019 Court of Appeals opinion in Indiana Land Trust v. XL; result reversed by Ind. Sup. Ct. 2020. Historical only.”, url: https://caseclips.courts.in.gov/2019/08/05/ind-land-trust-v-xl-investment/, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: case, note: “SUPERSEDED — supports the reversed 2012 Court of Appeals M&M holding. Historical only.”, url: https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/29221-appeals-court-affirms-tax-sale-notice-statute-unconstitutional, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: case, url: https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/purchaser-of-tax-sale-parcels-met-constitutional-statutory-notice-requirements-to-property-owners-in-supreme-court-affirms, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: case, url: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-166_8n59.pdf, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- {type: secondary, note: “SUPERSEDED — COA-rehearing coverage of the reversed Indiana Land Trust set-aside. Historical only.”, url: https://www.theindianalawyer.com/articles/coa-on-rehearing-lets-stand-ruling-setting-aside-tax-deed, retrieved: 2026-06-01}
- needs_verification:
- Auditor of Owen County v. Asset Recovery Inc — a surplus-recovery-agreement case under IC 6-1.1-24-7.5 was identified but the full opinion could not be retrieved (FindLaw 403); add as a verified surplus case once the opinion text is obtained.
- Tax-sale auction platform vendors and per-county online venue — confirm against official Indiana county auditor sources (SRI Inc. commonly cited but not verified here).
- Mortgage-foreclosure surplus distribution exact subsection within IC 32-29-7; statutory reinstatement right (likely none).
- SOL to challenge/set aside an Indiana tax deed (IC 6-1.1-25-4.6/16) and title-insurer/quiet-title practice citation.
- Statutory-disability tolling (minors/incompetents/SCRA) for the Indiana redemption period.
- Live county surplus claim form and SBOA tax-sale notice form links.
- open_questions:
- Post-Tyler, has Indiana amended IC 6-1.1-24-7 / the 3-year general-fund-transfer rule, or has any plaintiff argued the 3-year forfeiture itself is an unconstitutional taking of unclaimed surplus?
- Does the IC 6-1.1-24-7.5 10% cap apply to assignments of the surplus claim (vs. service agreements), and how does the AG treat out-of-state recovery operators?
- cross_links: tyler-v-hennepin-county, crowe-v-savvy-in, indiana-land-trust-v-xl-investment-properties, m-and-m-investment-group-v-ahlemeyer-farms, mullane-v-central-hanover, jones-v-flowers, mennonite-v-adams, right-of-redemption, surplus-funds, third-party-recovery-rules, surplus-recovery-fee-cap, treasurer-sale, sheriff-sale, due-process-notice, mortgagee-redemption, deficiency-judgment, bankruptcy-automatic-stay, federal-tax-lien-redemption, heirs-property, manufactured-homes
- changelog:
- 2026-06-01 — Case-law correction (good-law fixes). Corrected two reversed Court of Appeals holdings that had been presented as current law. (1) M&M Investment Group, LLC v. Ahlemeyer Farms, Inc. — the 2012 COA opinion (due process requires pre-sale mailed notice to a non-requesting mortgagee) was reversed by the Indiana Supreme Court, 03S04-1211-CC-645, 994 N.E.2d 1108 (Ind. Sept. 26, 2013), which held the IC 6-1.1-24-3(b) annual-request requirement does not violate Fourteenth Amendment due process. Verified via official courts.in.gov caseclips. (2) Indiana Land Trust Co. v. XL Investment Properties, LLC — the 2019 COA result (deed set aside; auditor must search own records) was reversed; the Indiana Supreme Court, 20S-MI-62, 155 N.E.3d 1177 (Ind. 2020), affirmed denial of the motion to set aside, holding the LaPorte County Auditor’s certified+first-class notice adequate and that the auditor need not search internal records when mail is not returned undeliverable. Verified via Justia tax-law-opinion summary + Indiana Lawyer (“…IN Supreme Court affirms”) headline. Rewrote the Module 8 table rows, Module 6 due-process bullets, Module 7, and the Module 9 mortgagee-redemption/heirs edge cases to state current holdings with correct good_law_status; tagged superseded COA sources “historical only.” Resolved the 5% vs 10% overbid/subs flag as VERIFIED 5%/yr (post-6/30/2014) per IC 6-1.1-25-2. Normalized cross-link slug to mennonite-v-adams. gap_score 12 → 9 (three needs_verification items resolved; remaining points are honest row-2 gaps only).
- 2026-06-01 — Initial population. Tax-lien-certificate system documented from official Indiana SBOA County Treasurer’s Manual + IC 6-1.1-24/25 (Justia/FindLaw mirrors) + IC 32-29-7 mortgage foreclosure. Verified case law: Crowe v. Savvy IN (Ind. 2023) and Indiana Land Trust v. XL (Ind. Ct. App. 2019) via official courts.in.gov caseclips; M&M v. Ahlemeyer Farms via Indiana Lawyer; Tyler v. Hennepin (SCOTUS). Indiana found Tyler-compliant (surplus fund returns overbid to former owner; IC 6-1.1-24-7). Documented 10% third-party surplus-recovery fee cap + AG enforcement (IC 6-1.1-24-7.5). Rate (5% vs 10%) on overbid/subs and the M&M / XL Supreme Court dispositions flagged for verification because the official IGA statute site and Cloudflare-protected mirrors could not be directly quoted.