Vermont — Tax & Mortgage Foreclosure

Legal information, not legal advice. Verify against the cited primary sources before acting. Last verified: 2026-06-01.

Vermont is a tax-deed-by-public-auction state, but with a strong owner-protective twist: the tax collector sells the real property itself at a public auction (not a transferable lien certificate), yet the purchaser takes no title for one full year — the owner keeps possession and a statutory right of redemption for one year from the day of sale at 1% per month interest on the sale price (32 V.S.A. § 5260). Tax-sale law lives in Title 32, Chapter 133, Subchapter 9 (§§ 5251–5263), administered by the municipal tax collector (Vermont collects property tax at the town/city level, not the county). The most business-critical Vermont fact is the surplus posture: the tax-sale statute itself is largely silent on excess proceeds, but Vermont has a long-standing common-law ruleBogie v. Town of Barnet (1970) — that a town selling for taxes acts under a fiduciary duty and must return surplus to the delinquent taxpayer, which positions Vermont as substantially compliant with tyler-v-hennepin-county in principle, while live litigation (Flynn v. Town of Barton, D. Vt. 2024) tests whether the actual practice of towns buying in at the tax sale and reselling for a windfall satisfies Tyler. Act 106 (2024) (H.629) added pre-sale guardrails: a $1,500 minimum delinquency, a mandatory repayment-plan offer, multilingual notice, and tighter notice rules.

0. Identity & Classification

  • Recording unit: Municipality (town/city), not the county. Vermont has 14 counties but property tax is assessed and collected by the ~247 towns and cities; the town clerk is the land-records office where the warrant, levy, report of sale, and collector’s deed are recorded (32 V.S.A. §§ 5252, 5255, 5261–5262). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05252
  • Tax sale type: Tax deed via public auction (redeemable). The collector sells the real property at public auction “to pay such taxes, costs, and fees” (32 V.S.A. § 5254); the buyer receives a certificate/report of sale, but the collector’s deed does not issue until the one-year redemption period expires unredeemed (§§ 5260, 5261). Functionally a redeemable tax deed, not a tradable lien certificate. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05254
  • Tax foreclosure process: Administrative / non-judicial. The municipal tax collector “extends a warrant,” levies, advertises, and conducts the auction without a court action; there is no judicial foreclosure decree for tax delinquency (32 V.S.A. §§ 5252–5255). Challenges to the tax/collection go to Superior Court within the § 5294 / § 5295 one-year limitations window (one year from the date of the levy — see Module 6); a separate § 5263 bar limits actions to recover the land against a tax-deed grantee in possession (one year from accrual — see Module 7).
  • Mortgage foreclosure process: Judicial (and predominantly strict foreclosure). Vermont mortgage foreclosure is in Superior Court under 12 V.S.A. Ch. 172; the default remedy is strict foreclosure (no sale) unless there is “substantial value in the property in excess of the mortgage debt,” in which case the court orders a judicial sale (12 V.S.A. § 4941 (strict foreclosure, subch. 2); §§ 4945–4954 (judicial sale, subch. 3)). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/12/172/04941
  • Selling authority: Municipal tax collector (tax sales); court-appointed / judicial process for mortgage (judicial sale conducted under court order; no private trustee — Vermont has no nonjudicial power-of-sale foreclosure for residential mortgages).
  • Statutory home: Tax sale — Title 32, Ch. 133, Subch. 9, §§ 5251–5263. Mortgage — Title 12, Ch. 172, §§ 4941–4954. Abatement — 24 V.S.A. § 1535.https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/chapter/32/133
  • Tyler v. Hennepin compliance: compliant (common-law), reform in progress. Vermont’s common law has required return of tax-sale surplus to the former owner since Bogie v. Town of Barnet, 128 Vt. 280 (1970) (town acts as fiduciary; surplus on resale belongs to the taxpayer). That doctrine aligns Vermont with Tyler in principle. But the tax-sale statute does not expressly create a surplus-claim procedure, and Flynn v. Town of Barton (D. Vt. 2:24-cv-00076, filed Jan. 2024) alleged towns still capture equity by buying in and reselling — that case settled in June 2024 (the Village of Orleans returned Ms. Flynn’s home and paid fees/costs), so it produced no merits ruling on the adequacy of Vermont’s procedure. Act 106 (2024) added pre-sale guardrails but did not enact a statutory surplus-return procedure. Classified compliant on the substantive rule, with the absence of a statutory surplus-claim mechanism noted as an open question (Module 11). — https://www.vtlegalaid.org/news/settlement-tax-sale-lawsuit-barton-orleans

1. Tax Sale Mechanics

  • What is sold: The real property (the fee), sold at public auction to pay the delinquent taxes, costs, and fees (32 V.S.A. § 5254(a): “the real property on which the taxes are due shall be sold to pay such taxes, costs, and fees”). The purchaser gets a report of sale (§ 5255) and an inchoate right that ripens into a collector’s deed only after the unredeemed one-year period (§ 5261). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05254
  • Bidding method: Highest-bid public auction. The collector may sell only so much of the land as is necessary (a partial-parcel sale requires environmental/zoning certifications under § 5254(b)). A municipality may itself bid/acquire the land at the tax sale (32 V.S.A. § 5259) — the common “town buys in” scenario at issue in Bogie and Flynn. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05254
  • Interest / penalty: Redemption interest = 1% per month (12% annual), or fraction of a month, on the price the property sold for, from the day of sale to the day of redemption (32 V.S.A. § 5260). Pre-sale, delinquent taxes also carry municipal interest and an 8% collection fee typical of Vermont towns under 24 V.S.A. § 1531/§ 1533 (exact pre-sale interest/penalty rate — needs_verification against the town’s adopted rate). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05260
  • Minimum bid composition: The delinquent tax + statutory costs + collector’s fees (advertising, recording, levy, and the § 5258 fee schedule). A tax sale may not be commenced unless the delinquency is at least $1,500 and is more than one year delinquent (Act 106 (2024), amending § 5252). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05252
  • Sale frequency / typical month: Ad hoc, scheduled by each town’s collector as delinquencies accrue; no statewide sale calendar or season. The sale date is fixed in the advertised notice (§§ 5252, 5253).
  • Venue / platforms: In-person public auction in the town, at the place stated in the published notice (§§ 5253, 5254). No statewide online auction platform; Vermont tax sales are run by the local collector, often with municipal counsel (VLCT-member towns). (Any town using an online vendor — needs_verification.)
  • Registration & deposit: Set by the conducting collector in the notice; not standardized by statute. (needs_verification per town.)
  • Subsequent taxes (“subs”): Not a lien-certificate “subs” regime (no transferable certificate). If the property is not redeemed, the purchaser takes the deed; taxes accruing during the redemption year remain the owner’s obligation while the owner retains possession (§ 5260). A municipality that acquires contaminated land may add assessment/remediation costs to the redemption amount (§ 5260). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05260

2. Right of Redemption → see right-of-redemption

  • Pre-sale right: Yes — the taxpayer may pay the delinquency (plus costs/fees) at any time before the day of sale and stop the sale (32 V.S.A. § 5254(a): sale occurs only “[w]hen the tax with costs and fees is not paid before the day of sale”). Act 106 also requires the collector to offer a written reasonable repayment plan before extending the warrant (§ 5252). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05252
  • Post-sale period: One (1) year from the day of sale (32 V.S.A. § 5260). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05260
  • Runs from: The day of the tax sale.
  • Tolling events: Not specified in § 5260; a bankruptcy filing triggers the federal automatic stay (11 U.S.C. § 362). (Statutory tolling for minors/incompetents — needs_verification; § 5260 does not appear to contain a disability extension.)
  • Who may redeem: The owner, lien holder, mortgagee, or their representatives or assigns (32 V.S.A. § 5260). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05260
  • Redemption amount formula: “the sum for which the land was sold” + interest at 1% per month (or fraction) from the day of sale to the day of payment (32 V.S.A. § 5260). For municipality-acquired contaminated land, add assessment/remediation costs. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05260
  • Premium to certificate holder: Not applicable in a lien-certificate sense; the purchaser’s return is the 1%/month interest on the bid price if redeemed, or the property if not redeemed (§§ 5260, 5261).
  • Procedure: Redemption is made by payment to the collector / town; on full payment the sale is voided and the purchaser is repaid bid + interest. If unredeemed after one year, the collector executes the collector’s deed to the purchaser (§ 5261) and records the land as not redeemed (§ 5262). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05261
  • Extinguishment: The right ends automatically at the end of the one-year period; thereafter the collector’s deed conveys “a title against the person for whose tax it was sold and those claiming under him or her” (§ 5261). A purchaser/ grantee in continuous open possession is then protected by the § 5263 one-year bar on actions to recover the land, in addition to the §§ 5294–5295 one-year bar on actions against the tax/levy (see Modules 6–7). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05261
  • Special tolling: Bankruptcy stay (11 U.S.C. § 362); SCRA servicemember protections (50 U.S.C. § 3991) may apply to a servicemember owner. (Vermont-specific application — needs_verification.)

3. Surplus / Excess Proceeds → see surplus-funds, third-party-recovery-rules

This is the business-critical and most contested part of Vermont law. The tax-sale statute is largely silent on excess proceeds; the controlling rule is common law, and a federal class action is testing it.

  • Belongs to: The former owner. Under Bogie v. Town of Barnet, 128 Vt. 280 (1970), a municipality conducting a tax sale “must suffer the restraints of fiduciary duty,” and surplus realized must be returned to the delinquent taxpayer — the town may not keep equity beyond the tax debt and costs. This is Vermont’s pre-Tyler home-equity-protection rule. — https://law.justia.com/cases/vermont/supreme-court/1970/128-69-0.html
  • Claim waterfall: (1) taxes, statutory costs and collector’s fees (§ 5258); (2) recorded lien holders / mortgagees (who may also redeem under § 5260); (3) the former owner receives the remainder. (The statute prescribes only that the collector pay the town the tax-satisfying amount and report under § 5255; the precise statutory mechanism for paying surplus to the owner is not spelled out — the duty is judicially imposed by Bogie. The exact procedural waterfall — needs_verification.)
  • Filing venue: No dedicated statutory surplus-claim office. In practice a former owner pursues surplus from the town/collector, or by suit in Superior Court (unjust enrichment / takings), as in the Bogie and Flynn litigation. (needs_verification: whether Act 106 or a later act created a formal claim venue.)
  • Claim deadline / escheat: The tax-sale statute does not set a surplus-claim deadline or an escheat-to-state mechanism for tax-sale surplus. Generic unclaimed funds held by a municipality could fall under Vermont’s Unclaimed Property Act (27 V.S.A. Ch. 14). (Whether tax-sale surplus escheats and the reclaim period — needs_verification.)
  • Documentation required: Proof of former ownership / heirship; not statutorily enumerated for tax surplus. (needs_verification.)
  • Third-party recovery (CRITICAL for recovery agents):
    • fee_cap_pct: No tax-surplus-specific statutory fee cap identified. Vermont’s general unclaimed-property “finder/locator” rules (27 V.S.A. Ch. 14, Revised Uniform Unclaimed Property Act) cap and time-restrict locator agreements for property held by the State Treasurer, but it is unclear these reach tax-sale surplus held by a town or owed directly by it. (Exact cap %, void-within-N-months rule, and whether it applies pre-escheat — needs_verification.)
    • licensing_required: No tax-surplus “finder” license identified. (needs_verification.)
    • assignment_of_claim_allowed: § 5260 expressly lets an assign of the owner/ lienholder redeem, implying the redemption right (and by extension a surplus claim) is assignable; but no statute squarely authorizes assignment of a surplus claim. (needs_verification.)
    • cooling_off_period / disclosure / prohibited practices: None tax-surplus-specific identified. Vermont’s Consumer Protection Act (9 V.S.A. Ch. 63) prohibits unfair/ deceptive acts generally and would govern abusive recovery contracts. (needs_verification for any surplus-specific disclosure rule.)
    • Bottom line for operators: Vermont surplus is owner property by common law (Bogie), recoverable directly from the town or via suit; there is no clear statutory fee cap or licensing regime for recovery agents, but the live Flynn litigation and Act 106 reforms make the area volatile — confirm current law before operating.
  • Notice to former owner required? Yes for the sale (certified-mail notice ≥ 30 days, publication, posting, email — § 5252). The statute does not prescribe a separate post-sale surplus notice; the Bogie fiduciary duty supplies the substantive right. (Surplus-notice procedure — needs_verification.)https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05252

4. Mortgage Foreclosure

  • Process: Judicial, in Superior Court (12 V.S.A. Ch. 172). Two paths: strict foreclosure (decree forecloses the equity of redemption with no sale) and judicial sale foreclosure (court orders a public sale). Vermont has no nonjudicial power-of-sale foreclosure for residential mortgages. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/12/172/04941
  • Strict vs. sale gate: “No decree foreclosing the right of redemption without sale shall be issued absent a finding by the court that there is no substantial value in the property in excess of the mortgage debt” plus unpaid taxes and junior liens (12 V.S.A. § 4941(c)). Where equity exists, the court orders a judicial sale (§ 4945) — protecting the owner’s surplus, consistent with the Tyler principle. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/12/172/04941
  • Timeline: After a notice of intention to foreclose and complaint, the court enters a decree. Strict-foreclosure redemption = 6 months from the decree (unless a shorter time is ordered or the parties agree) (§ 4941). Judicial-sale redemption for an owner-occupied principal dwelling/farmland is likewise 6 months from the decree (unless shortened), and no sale of an owner-occupied principal residence may occur within 7 months of service of the complaint; for non-residential property the court may eliminate or reduce the redemption period to no more than 30 days (12 V.S.A. § 4946, not § 4945). (Exact pre-suit notice day-counts — needs_verification.)https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/12/172/04946
  • Reinstatement / right to redeem before sale: The mortgagor may redeem at any time prior to the public sale by paying the full judgment amount plus post-judgment costs and expenses of sale (12 V.S.A. § 4949). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/12/172/04949
  • Redemption after sale: For strict foreclosure, redemption runs 6 months from the decree and there is no post-decree sale; once the period expires the mortgagee owns the property (§ 4941). For judicial sale, the redemption period precedes the sale (§ 4946); no separate post-sale statutory redemption after confirmation (§§ 4946, 4949, 4954).
  • Deficiency judgment: Allowed. In a judicial sale, “the court may assess a judgment against the mortgagor for the deficiency if the proceeds of sale are insufficient to meet the expenses incurred in making the sale and the amount due to the plaintiff”; failure to request a deficiency judgment is deemed a waiver (12 V.S.A. § 4954, not § 4945). (Fair-value-offset mechanics / whether strict foreclosure under § 4941 bars a deficiency — needs_verification.)https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/12/172/04954
  • Surplus distribution: After a judicial sale, proceeds pay (1) reasonable expenses incurred in making the sale, then (2) amounts due the plaintiff, then (3) other lienholders of record in the order of priority of their liens, and any excess is paid to the defendant mortgagor (12 V.S.A. § 4954, “Procedure following sale”). The court issues a confirmation order. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/12/172/04954
  • Sale officer: Court-supervised (no private trustee); the sale is conducted under the foreclosure decree and confirmed by the court.

5. Sale Procedure Playbooks

  • Municipal tax-collector sale — ordered steps → see treasurer-sale:
    1. Tax becomes delinquent; collector confirms delinquency is ≥ $1,500 and > 1 year old, and offers a written reasonable repayment plan before proceeding (32 V.S.A. § 5252, as amended by Act 106 (2024)).
    2. Collector extends a warrant and levies on the land; files the warrant, tax bill, land description, and statement of levy with the town clerk (§ 5252).
    3. Advertise the sale three weeks successively in a newspaper circulating in the vicinity, the last publication ≥ 10 days before the sale (§§ 5252, 5253); post notice in a public place in town (§ 5252).
    4. Mail certified notice ≥ 30 days before the sale to the delinquent taxpayer and to mortgagees/lienholders; if returned unclaimed, use first-class mail or personal service; email if obtainable; affix notice to the structure’s front door (§ 5252). Notices include a multilingual warning in the state’s five most common non-English languages (Act 106). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05252
    5. Public auction; highest bidder pays taxes/costs/fees; a municipality may bid and acquire the land (§§ 5254, 5259). Collector files a report of sale with the town clerk within the statutory window (§ 5255).
    6. One-year redemption runs from sale day; owner keeps possession (§ 5260).
    7. If unredeemed, collector executes the collector’s deed (§ 5261) and records the land as not redeemed (§ 5262). Surplus, if any, is owed to the former owner under Bogie (Module 3).
  • Sheriff sale — ordered steps → see sheriff-sale: Not used for tax foreclosure. Mortgage judicial sales are court-ordered and court-confirmed (12 V.S.A. §§ 4945 et seq.); sheriff’s sales otherwise arise only on execution of money judgments, outside this scope.
  • Notice requirements: Tax — publication 3 weeks (last ≥ 10 days pre-sale) + certified mail ≥ 30 days + posting + email + door-posting (§§ 5252–5253). Mortgage — notice of intention to foreclose + complaint per Ch. 172. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05253
  • Upset bid / confirmation: Tax — none (no upset-bid statute). Mortgage — judicial sale requires court confirmation (§ 4945 subch.).
  • Payment terms: Tax — auction payment to the collector per the notice (terms set locally). Mortgage — per the decree.
  • Deed issued: Tax — collector’s deed after the unredeemed one-year period (§ 5261); conveys title “against the person for whose tax it was sold and those claiming under him,” i.e., no general warranties (closer to a special/limited deed). Marketability hinges on strict notice compliance and the § 5263 limitations bar (Module 7).

6. Due Process & Notice → see due-process-notice

7. Title & Marketability

  • Deed warranty level: Collector’s deed, conveying only “a title against the person for whose tax it was sold and those claiming under him or her” (32 V.S.A. § 5261) — effectively a limited/special conveyance, not a general-warranty deed.
  • Marketable immediately? No, not without diligence. Per the Vermont Attorney’s Title Corporation Title Standard 19.1, a collector’s-deed title is treated as marketable when (a) the deed is properly executed and recorded, (b) the examiner confirms the §§ 5252–5253 notice/due-process steps were satisfied, and (c) the applicable one-year limitations periods have run unchallenged — the § 5294/ § 5295 bar on actions against the tax/levy and the § 5263 bar on actions to recover the land against a grantee in continuous open possession who has paid the taxes (or 15 years’ open, notorious possession). — https://www.vermontattorneystitle.com/title-standards/19-1-tax-collectors-deed/
  • Quiet title required? Often advisable where notice is questionable; many practitioners rely on the § 5263 grantee-in-possession bar plus a clean notice record rather than a routine quiet-title suit.
  • SOL to challenge the tax/levy: One (1) year to bring an action against the tax / levy, measured “from the date of the levy by the tax collector” (32 V.S.A. §§ 5294–5295; applied in Contos). A separate one-year bar (§ 5263) protects a tax-deed grantee in continuous open possession from actions to recover the land, running one year from when the cause of action accrues. Continuous open possession for 15 years also cures (Title Standard 19.1). — https://legislature.vermont.gov/statutes/section/32/133/05294
  • Title insurance availability: Generally available once §§ 5252–5253 compliance and the applicable one-year limitations periods are confirmed; underwriters focus on notice compliance and the Tyler/surplus exposure (sale-price-vs-value disparity is flagged as a due-process risk in Standard 19.1).
  • Common defects: Defective §§ 5252–5253 notice (misaddressed mail, short timing — cf. Contos); failure to return surplus to the former owner (Bogie/Flynn exposure); undischarged state/federal tax liens (may survive the tax sale); unresolved heirs.

8. Case Law (real, verified)

CaseYearTopicHolding (plain English)Source
bogie-v-town-of-barnet (Bogie v. Town of Barnet, 128 Vt. 280 (1970))1970surplusA town conducting a tax sale acts under a fiduciary duty; where the town buys in and resells at a profit, the surplus belongs to the delinquent taxpayer, not the town — Vermont’s pre-Tyler home-equity-protection rule. (Court contrasted a true third-party purchase at the tax sale for taxes-only, where no surplus then exists.)https://law.justia.com/cases/vermont/supreme-court/1970/128-69-0.html
contos-v-town-of-londonderry (Emanuel G. Contos v. Town of Londonderry & Superchi, Vt. S. Ct. docket 22-AP-240, decided Feb. 10, 2023)2023due_process / sale_procedureTax-sale notice is judged by substantial compliance; actual notice is not required, only notice “reasonably calculated … to apprise” (Mullane). Sending an extra notice before the first was returned unclaimed was reasonable. The one-year limitations to challenge the tax (32 V.S.A. §§ 5294–5295) runs from the date of the levy. (Exact neutral-citation format — see needs_verification.)https://www.vlct.org/article/supreme-court-provides-clarity-tax-sale-process
ran-mar-v-town-of-berlin (Ran-Mar, Inc. v. Town of Berlin, 2006 VT 117)2006sale_procedure / due_processThe Court upheld a tax sale: “fees” are collectible by tax sale, and a town’s loose use of “penalties” for the collector’s fee did not invalidate the sale; notice was adequate because it was clear enough to apprise the taxpayer of the sale and amount due. Applies a reasonableness / substantial-compliance standard rather than requiring strict technical compliance.https://law.justia.com/cases/vermont/supreme-court/2006/op2005-311.html
flynn-v-town-of-barton (Flynn v. Town of Barton, No. 2:24-cv-00076 (D. Vt., filed Jan. 2024))2024surplus / redemptionVermont Legal Aid suit: a ~6,550** in taxes; alleged Vermont’s tax-sale practice (town buys in, resells, keeps equity) is an unconstitutional taking / excessive fine / due-process violation and unjust enrichment post-Tyler. Settled June 2024 — Village of Orleans returned the home and paid fees/costs; no merits ruling issued.https://www.vtlegalaid.org/news/settlement-tax-sale-lawsuit-barton-orleans
tyler-v-hennepin-county (Tyler v. Hennepin County, 598 U.S. 631 (2023))2023surplusRetaining a former owner’s surplus equity beyond the tax debt is an unconstitutional taking (Fifth Amendment). Frames Vermont’s Bogie rule and the Flynn challenge.https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/598/22-166/

9. Edge Cases (state-specific notes)

  • bankruptcy-automatic-stay — A Chapter 7/13 filing stays the tax sale and the running of collection; interaction with the one-year redemption clock is fact-specific. (Vermont-specific tolling — needs_verification.)
  • federal-tax-lien-redemption — A recorded federal tax lien gives the IRS a 120-day post-sale redemption right (26 U.S.C. § 7425); Vermont Title Standard 19.1 warns that state and federal tax liens may not be extinguished by a Vermont tax sale. — https://www.vermontattorneystitle.com/title-standards/19-1-tax-collectors-deed/
  • heirs-property — “Owner” includes those claiming under the record owner; heirs may redeem (§ 5260) and are entitled to surplus under Bogie. (Heirship-proof procedure — needs_verification.)
  • seniors-tax-deferral — Act 106 (2024) added the $1,500 threshold and mandatory repayment-plan offer specifically to protect older, disabled, and low-income Vermonters from losing homes over small debts. — https://legislature.vermont.gov/bill/status/2024/H.629
  • void-vs-voidable — Ordinary notice defects are voidable and time-barred after the §§ 5294–5295 one-year window measured from the levy (Contos); only defects “of jurisdictional magnitude” void the sale.
  • tyler-v-hennepin-county — Vermont’s Bogie fiduciary rule predates Tyler; Flynn tests whether actual municipal practice (buy-in + resale) satisfies it.
  • tax-abatement — Municipal abatement (24 V.S.A. § 1535, amended by Act 106) provides an administrative off-ramp before/around tax sale.

10. Operations

11. Meta

  • sources:
  • needs_verification:
    • Contos v. Town of Londonderry exact neutral-citation format: Confirmed real (Justia docket 22-AP-240, decided Feb. 10, 2023) and holdings verified, but Justia’s metadata inconsistently shows a “2021 VT 20” tag. Confirm the slip-opinion’s official neutral citation (e.g., “2023 VT __”) before citing a VT ¶ number; the page currently cites by docket/date, which is reliable.
    • Exact § 5294 vs. § 5295 split: §§ 5294–5295 set the one-year-from-levy bar applied in Contos; § 5294 text (one year from collection by arrest/distraint/levy) was fetched, but § 5295’s “from the date of the levy” sub-language is drawn from Contos/VLCT rather than a direct § 5295 fetch. Confirm § 5295 text directly.
    • Surplus return procedure (the core business question): Bogie establishes the substantive right (surplus to taxpayer); Act 106 (2024) was confirmed to add pre-sale guardrails but not a statutory surplus-claim/return procedure. The statutory mechanism, claim venue, deadline, and any escheat for tax-sale surplus remain common-law-only; confirm no later session has added one.
    • Third-party recovery rules for tax surplus: no tax-specific fee cap, licensing, cooling-off, or disclosure statute located; confirm whether Vermont’s RUUPA (27 V.S.A. Ch. 14) finder-fee cap applies to tax-sale surplus and at what %.
    • Strict-foreclosure deficiency: § 4954 deficiency (judicial sale) confirmed; confirm whether strict foreclosure under § 4941 bars a deficiency and the fair-value-offset mechanics.
    • Pre-sale interest/penalty/collection-fee rate (24 V.S.A. §§ 1531–1533) — exact statewide/town rates not fetched directly.
    • § 5260 pre-redemption-end notice: the § 5260 fetch indicated a collector duty to notify the taxpayer 90–120 days before the redemption period ends; confirm exact day-count and codification (possibly Act 106 amendment to § 5260).
    • Bankruptcy / minors / SCRA tolling of the one-year tax redemption — not confirmed against a Vermont primary source.
  • open_questions:
    • Does Vermont’s Bogie common-law surplus rule, without a statutory claim procedure, satisfy Tyler’s requirement of a meaningful opportunity to recover surplus? Flynn raised this but settled (June 2024) without a merits ruling, so the question is still open and untested in court post-Tyler.
    • When a municipality buys in at the tax sale (§ 5259) and later resells, at what point and by what process must it tender surplus to the former owner?
    • Do any Vermont consumer-protection or unclaimed-property rules cap recovery-agent fees for tax-sale surplus, or is the field unregulated?
  • cross_links: right-of-redemption, surplus-funds, third-party-recovery-rules, treasurer-sale, sheriff-sale, due-process-notice, tyler-v-hennepin-county, jones-v-flowers, mullane-v-central-hanover, mennonite-v-adams, bogie-v-town-of-barnet, contos-v-town-of-londonderry, ran-mar-v-town-of-berlin, flynn-v-town-of-barton, bankruptcy-automatic-stay, federal-tax-lien-redemption, heirs-property, seniors-tax-deferral, void-vs-voidable, tyler-v-hennepin-county, tax-abatement
  • changelog:
    • 2026-06-01 — Initial population. Primary sources: 32 V.S.A. §§ 5252, 5254, 5255, 5260, 5261 (+ Ch. 133 list, § 5263); 12 V.S.A. §§ 4941, 4945, 4949 (mortgage). Cases: Bogie v. Town of Barnet (128 Vt. 280, 1970), Contos v. Town of Londonderry (2021/2023), Ran-Mar v. Town of Berlin (2006), Flynn v. Town of Barton (D. Vt. 2024), Tyler (2023). Key findings: Vermont = redeemable tax-deed-by-auction at the town level, 1-year / 1%-per-month redemption (§ 5260); surplus belongs to the former owner by common law (Bogie), with no clear statutory claim procedure (live Flynn litigation); Act 106 (2024) added $1,500 threshold + repayment plan + multilingual notice. Mortgage = judicial, strict foreclosure default (6-mo redemption) unless substantial equity forces a judicial sale.
    • 2026-06-01 — Adversarial citation verification pass. Retrieved and confirmed all tax statutes (§§ 5252, 5254, 5255, 5260, 5261, 5263) and chapter list; confirmed mortgage statutes via Ch. 172 list (§§ 4941, 4946, 4949, 4954). Verified all five cases against retrieved sources. Fixes: (1) Limitations wrong-cite — corrected the “one year from date of levy” challenge bar from § 5263 to §§ 5294–5295 (§ 5263 is the separate grantee-in-possession recover-land bar that runs from accrual, not levy); fixed throughout Modules 0, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10. A § 5263 cite even carried a mismatched § 5262 URL. (2) Mortgage wrong-cites — moved the 6-mo owner-occupied judicial-sale redemption from § 4945 to § 4946, and deficiency + surplus waterfall from § 4945/guessed-§4946/§4947 to § 4954 (“Procedure following sale”); language confirmed. (3) Ran-Mar holding corrected — it upheld the sale on a reasonableness standard (“fees” collectible; “penalties” label not fatal), not “strict compliance”; pinned neutral cite 2006 VT 117. (4) Contos re-cited by reliable docket 22-AP-240 / Feb 10 2023 (dropped unreliable “2021 VT 20” assertion to needs_verification). (5) Flynn updated from “pending” to settled June 2024 (home returned; no merits ruling); fixed Tyler-compliance posture and the Tyler row’s misattributed Flynn source URL → Justia 598 U.S. 631. (6) Confirmed Act 106 amended sections and that it added no statutory surplus-return procedure. No fabricated citations found. Resolved 4 needs_verification items; remaining gaps are honest.

Legal information, not legal advice. This page summarizes Vermont law from the cited primary sources as of the last_verified date. Statutes, interest rates, notice forms, and case law change; municipal practices vary across Vermont’s ~247 towns and cities, and the surplus/Tyler question remains unsettled (the Flynn v. Town of Barton challenge settled in June 2024 without a merits ruling). Verify against the current Vermont Statutes (Titles 12, 24, 27, 32), Act 106 (2024), the applicable town’s procedures, and consult a licensed Vermont attorney before acting. Last verified: 2026-06-01.