Illinois — Tax & Mortgage Foreclosure
Legal information, not legal advice. Verify against the cited primary sources before acting. Last verified: 2026-06-01.
MAJOR FLUX WARNING (2025–2026). Illinois’s tax-sale system is in active constitutional and legislative reform. In December 2025 a federal court held the Cook County tax-sale system unconstitutional under the Fifth and Eighth Amendments (bell-v-pappas-2025), and in May 2026 the General Assembly passed a reform bill (House Bill 4537) to return surplus equity to former owners and bring Illinois into tyler-v-hennepin-county compliance. Several figures below (post-2026 fee schedule, surplus-equity fund, extended redemption) reflect that pending bill and are flagged in module 11 until the enacted public-act text is verified.
0. Identity & Classification
- Recording unit: county (count: 102)
- Tax sale type: tax lien certificate (a “certificate of purchase”; the buyer later petitions the circuit court for a tax deed if the property is not redeemed). Illinois is a hybrid certificate→deed state.
- Tax foreclosure process: judicial-overlay administrative — the county collector obtains an annual judgment and order of sale from the circuit court (35 ILCS 200/21-150 et seq.); the sale is conducted by the collector, and the certificate holder must petition the circuit court for the tax deed (35 ILCS 200/22-30 et seq.).
- Mortgage foreclosure process: judicial (735 ILCS 5/15-1101 et seq., Article XV).
- Selling authority: county collector / county treasurer (the treasurer is ex officio county collector).
- Statutory home: Property Tax Code, 35 ILCS 200/ (tax sale, redemption, tax deeds, indemnity fund) — https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=596&ChapterID=8; Mortgage Foreclosure, 735 ILCS 5/ Article XV.
- Tyler v. Hennepin compliance: non_compliant → reformed_post_Tyler (in transition). Historically Illinois retained the homeowner’s surplus equity: the tax buyer paid only the delinquent taxes/penalties and, on non-redemption, received a tax deed for the entire property regardless of value — the former owner received nothing absent an indemnity-fund claim. A federal court held this unconstitutional in bell-v-pappas-2025 (Dec. 2025), and HB4537 (passed May 2026, awaiting signature) creates a surplus-equity mechanism. Until the act is signed and effective, the operative statutes still embody the non-compliant model. See tyler-v-hennepin-county.
1. Tax Sale Mechanics
- What is sold: lien certificate (“certificate of purchase”). Two sale tracks: the annual tax sale (current-year delinquencies) and the scavenger sale (parcels delinquent 3+ years / unsold at annual sale, 35 ILCS 200/21-260).
- Bidding method: bid-down-the-penalty. “The person at the sale offering to pay the amount due on each property for the least penalty percentage shall be the purchaser.” No bid may exceed 9% per penalty period. (35 ILCS 200/21-215) (Note: prior law and many secondary sources cite an 18% maximum; the currently retrieved statutory text states 9% — see needs_verification.)
- Interest / penalty: the winning penalty bid is a per-period penalty (not simple annual interest); it multiplies as the redemption period runs — see §2. (35 ILCS 200/21-355)
- Minimum bid composition: delinquent tax principal + special assessments + interest + penalties + costs and fees of sale (the “certificate amount”); plus a nonrefundable fee. (35 ILCS 200/21-355; 21-295)
- Sale frequency: annual (each county) plus periodic scavenger sales.
- Typical month: varies by county; held after the annual judgment and order of sale. (Exact statewide timing window — needs_verification.)
- Venue: both in-person and online, by county practice.
- Platform vendors: county-specific (e.g., Cook County uses RAMS-2 / online vendors). (Vendor list — needs_verification.)
- Registration & deposit: county-specific; registration and deposit required in advance. (Statewide rule — needs_verification.)
- Subsequent taxes (“subs”): the certificate holder may pay later-accruing delinquent taxes and add them to the redemption amount with a 12% penalty per year or portion thereof between payment and redemption. (35 ILCS 200/21-355)
2. Right of Redemption → see right-of-redemption
- Pre-sale right: the owner may pay the delinquency at any time before the sale to avoid it. (35 ILCS 200/21-150 et seq.)
- Post-sale period (runs from the date of sale): (35 ILCS 200/21-350)
- General rule: 2.5 years from the date of sale.
- 1 year if, on the date of sale, the property is vacant non-farm property, commercial/industrial property, or a structure with 7+ residential units.
- The certificate holder may extend the redemption deadline, but not beyond 3 years from the date of sale. (35 ILCS 200/21-385)
- (Historically the code used a 2-year general / 2.5-year owner-occupied / 6-month commercial structure; the currently retrieved 21-350 text states the 2.5-year / 1-year structure above — flagged in needs_verification for the interaction with the pending HB4537 6-month extension.)
- Who may redeem: owners, occupants, and any party with a legal or equitable interest (including mortgagees, lienholders, heirs). (35 ILCS 200/21-345, 21-350)
- Redemption amount formula: certificate amount + the penalty bid times a period multiplier: ×1 (0–6 mo), ×2 (6–12 mo), ×3 (12–18 mo), ×4 (18–24 mo), ×5 (24–30 mo), ×6 (30–36 mo); plus 12% per year on subsequently-paid taxes; plus county clerk, circuit clerk, sheriff, publication, and other statutory fees. (35 ILCS 200/21-355)
- Premium to certificate holder: the escalating penalty multiplier (above) is the holder’s return; it is paid out of the redemption money to the holder.
- Procedure: redemption is made by deposit with the county clerk, who issues a redemption receipt and pays the certificate holder. (35 ILCS 200/21-355, 21-360)
- Extinguishment: the right of redemption is cut off when it expires unredeemed and the circuit court issues an order directing the county clerk to issue a tax deed (35 ILCS 200/22-40); proper take-notice service is a precondition (35 ILCS 200/22-5, 22-10).
- Special tolling: the indemnity fund (10-year claim window) backstops owners who lose property despite the redemption scheme. (Minors/incompetents/SCRA tolling specifics — needs_verification.)
3. Surplus / Excess Proceeds → see surplus-funds, third-party-recovery-rules
- Belongs to (historical, pre-reform): effectively the tax buyer captured the equity — there is no traditional surplus pool in an Illinois tax sale because the buyer pays only the taxes and, on non-redemption, takes a deed to the whole parcel. The former owner’s only remedy was the Indemnity Fund. This is the exact mechanism held unconstitutional in bell-v-pappas-2025.
- Indemnity Fund (the surrogate for surplus):
- Belongs to: former owners who “sustain loss or damage by reason of the issuance of a tax deed.” (35 ILCS 200/21-305)
- Filing venue: petition in the circuit court that issued the tax deed, naming the County Treasurer (as trustee) as defendant. (35 ILCS 200/21-305)
- Claim deadline: within 10 years after the tax deed was issued. (35 ILCS 200/21-305)
- Recovery cap: owner-occupied residential (≤4 units) — equitable award up to $99,000 (more if no fault/negligence shown); other property — fair cash value minus mortgages/liens, if no fault/negligence. (35 ILCS 200/21-305)
- Fund source: a fee on each tax purchase — up to 80 fee per item plus 5% of taxes, interest, and penalties. County Treasurer is trustee and invests the fund. (35 ILCS 200/21-295)
- Pending reform (HB4537, May 2026, not yet effective): creates a surplus-equity fund funded by tax-buyer fees so that former owners “recoup some of the surplus once those properties are sold,” extends initial redemption by ~6 months, and establishes a Cook County 6-year pilot acquiring up to 100 certificates on low-tax homestead parcels. (Public-act number and effective date — needs_verification.)
- Escheat / forfeiture: unredeemed parcels not sold can be forfeited to the taxing bodies; the State Treasurer’s unclaimed-property regime does not house a tax-sale “surplus” because none is generated under the historical model.
- Documentation required (indemnity claim): proof of ownership/interest, the tax deed and order, loss/damage, and (for above-equitable awards) absence of fault/negligence. (35 ILCS 200/21-305)
- Third-party recovery (recovery-agent rules):
- fee_cap_pct: null — Illinois has no general statutory percentage cap on surplus/indemnity recovery-agent fees in the Property Tax Code as retrieved. (needs_verification — confirm whether the Surplus-Funds / finder statutes or HB4537 impose a cap.)
- licensing_required: unclear / needs_verification.
- assignment_of_claim_allowed: certificates of purchase are freely assignable (e.g., GAN C → Blossom63 in county-collector-blossom63-2022); assignment of indemnity claims — needs_verification.
- cooling_off_period / contract_disclosure / prohibited_practices: needs_verification.
- Notice to former owner required? Yes for the tax-deed stage (take-notice, 35 ILCS 200/22-10). Dedicated former-owner surplus notice did not exist under the historical no-surplus model; HB4537 may add one (needs_verification).
4. Mortgage Foreclosure → see sheriff-sale
- Process: judicial (735 ILCS 5/ Article XV, “Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law”).
- Timeline (key statutory milestones):
- Grace period: lender generally must allow the loan to go ~120 days delinquent (federal servicing rules) before filing; then files a foreclosure complaint in circuit court.
- Reinstatement: the borrower may reinstate (cure the default and pay costs) within 90 days after being served with summons or by publication. (735 ILCS 5/15-1602)
- Redemption after judgment: ends on the later of (a) 7 months from the date the mortgagor was served or submitted to jurisdiction, or (b) 3 months from entry of the foreclosure judgment. (735 ILCS 5/15-1603) Shorter periods apply to abandoned/commercial property.
- Sale & confirmation: judicial sale may not occur until the redemption period expires; the court must then enter an order confirming the sale (735 ILCS 5/15-1508).
- Deficiency judgment: allowed; personal deficiency is fixed at the confirmation of sale (e.g., debt minus sale price), unless waived or discharged in bankruptcy. (735 ILCS 5/15-1508, 15-1511)
- Surplus distribution: sale proceeds are applied to (1) sale expenses, (2) costs of securing/maintaining the property, (3) claims in the priority order of the foreclosure judgment, and (4) surplus held by the court until a party obtains an order for distribution; unclaimed surplus is ultimately forfeited to the State. (735 ILCS 5/15-1512) — this is a genuine surplus pool, unlike the tax side.
- Sale officer: sheriff (or a court-appointed selling officer / judicial sales corporation).
5. Sale Procedure Playbooks
- Tax sale (county collector) — ordered steps: → see treasurer-sale
- Taxes go delinquent; county collector publishes the delinquent list and mails notice ≥15 days before applying for judgment.
- Collector applies to the circuit court for judgment and order of sale (35 ILCS 200/21-150 et seq.).
- Annual tax sale held; buyer bids down the penalty (max 9%/period, 35 ILCS 200/21-215) and receives a certificate of purchase after paying the amount due + indemnity fee (35 ILCS 200/21-295).
- Redemption period runs (2.5 yr general / 1 yr vacant-commercial; extendable to 3 yr) (35 ILCS 200/21-350, 21-385).
- Buyer serves the take-notice (35 ILCS 200/22-5, 22-10) and petitions the circuit court for a tax deed (35 ILCS 200/22-30 et seq.).
- If unredeemed and notice was strict-compliant, court orders the county clerk to issue a tax deed (35 ILCS 200/22-40).
- Sheriff sale (mortgage) — ordered steps: → see sheriff-sale complaint → service → reinstatement (90 days) / redemption (later of 7 mo / 3 mo) → judgment of foreclosure → sheriff’s sale → order confirming sale → deed/possession (735 ILCS 5/15-1506, 15-1508, 15-1603).
- Notice requirements: tax — collector’s published delinquent list + mailed pre-judgment notice; take-notice served not less than 3 nor more than 6 months before redemption expires, in ≥10-point type with statutorily-fixed contents (35 ILCS 200/22-10). Mortgage — service of summons + published notice of sale.
- Upset-bid / confirmation: tax — no upset-bid; the court’s tax-deed order is the control point. Mortgage — court confirmation of sale required (735 ILCS 5/15-1508).
- Payment terms: tax — full payment of amount due at sale before certificate issues. Mortgage — per sale notice (cashier’s check/deposit).
- Deed issued: tax — tax deed by court order via county clerk (see §7). Mortgage — judicial sale deed after confirmation.
6. Due Process & Notice → see due-process-notice
- Standard: Illinois requires strict compliance with the Property Tax Code’s notice provisions for tax deeds (35 ILCS 200/22-5, 22-10, 22-15), measured against the federal floor of mullane-v-central-hanover (“reasonably calculated”), mennonite-v-adams (actual mailed notice to record mortgagees), and jones-v-flowers (additional steps after returned mail).
- Required attempts: publication + mailed take-notice to owners, occupants, and parties of record; personal service attempts on owners/occupants by the sheriff (35 ILCS 200/22-15). Diligent inquiry of the public record is required.
- Consequence of defective notice: the tax deed is voidable (subject to the Tax Code’s incontestability/fraud framework, 35 ILCS 200/22-45); a deed procured by failure to disclose material facts can be set aside for fraud.
- Leading cases: county-collector-blossom63-2022 (strict-compliance scope), bell-v-pappas-2025 (Takings/Excessive Fines), mullane-v-central-hanover, mennonite-v-adams, jones-v-flowers.
7. Title & Marketability
- Deed warranty level: a tax deed conveys merchantable title by operation of the court order under 35 ILCS 200/22-40 / 22-70 — it is not a warranty deed but the statute deems it to convey good and merchantable title when the proceedings are regular. (Exact “merchantable title” statutory cite — needs_verification.)
- Marketable immediately? Generally yes by statute upon proper issuance, but title insurers commonly require a quiet-title action or seasoning before insuring.
- Quiet title required? Practically often yes for title-insurance purposes, though not strictly required to convey title.
- SOL to challenge the deed: the Tax Code provides strong incontestability protections; collateral attack is limited largely to fraud and statutory grounds, and indemnity claims run 10 years (35 ILCS 200/21-305). (Precise limitations period for direct relief from the tax-deed order — needs_verification.)
- Title insurance availability: available but underwriting-dependent (often requires quiet title); the bell-v-pappas-2025 / HB4537 turmoil increases insurer caution.
- Common defects: defective take-notice service; missed parties of record; bankruptcy-stay violations; sale-in-error grounds (35 ILCS 200/21-310); and now constitutional (surplus-equity) challenges.
8. Case Law (real, verified)
| Case | Year | Topic | Holding (plain English) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| county-collector-blossom63-2022 (In re Application of the County Collector (Blossom63 Enterprises, LLC v. Devonshire, LLC), 2022 IL 126929) | 2022 | sale_procedure / due_process | A tax-deed applicant strictly complied with the 35 ILCS 200/22-5 take-notice by listing the delinquent tax year for which the sale was held; it need not also list additional later years for which it paid taxes. Appellate court affirmed; circuit court (which had vacated the deed) reversed. | https://ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.net/antilles-resources/resources/867ea32b-246b-4839-a734-7c0b272dd79c/In%20re%20Application%20of%20the%20County%20Collector,%202022%20IL%20126929.pdf |
| bell-v-pappas-2025 (Bell v. Pappas, No. 1:22-cv-07061, N.D. Ill., Kennelly, J.) | 2025 | surplus / due_process | Cook County’s tax-sale system violates the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and Eighth Amendment Excessive Fines Clause by stripping owners of equity exceeding the tax debt; the County cannot escape liability because private tax-lien investors (not the County) pocket the equity. Applies tyler-v-hennepin-county. (Dec. 2025 liability ruling; May 2026 damages ruling, ~$15.4M/yr est.) | https://www.legalnewsline.com/cook-county-record/cook-county-property-tax-sale-system-unconstitutional/article_8f12879d-582a-48ab-9914-6bc7c1da090c.html |
| tyler-v-hennepin-county (Tyler v. Hennepin County, 598 U.S. 631) | 2023 | surplus | Government retaining surplus equity beyond the tax debt is an unconstitutional taking; the controlling landmark Illinois must reconcile with. | https://www.illinoispolicy.org/judge-rules-cook-county-tax-sale-illegal-lawmakers-yet-to-act/ |
| county-collector-blossom63-2022 / 21-310 sale-in-error | — | redemption / sale_procedure | (See module 11 — additional verified redemption-specific Illinois appellate cases pending re-verification.) | — |
Topic coverage: due_process ✓ (Blossom63; Bell), sale_procedure ✓ (Blossom63), surplus ✓ (Bell; Tyler). redemption — covered statutorily and touched in Blossom63 (take-notice/redemption interplay) but a dedicated verified redemption-holding case is flagged in needs_verification.
9. Edge Cases (state-specific notes)
- bankruptcy-automatic-stay — a bankruptcy petition filed by/against the owner before the tax sale is a mandatory sale-in-error ground; filed after the sale but before the deed is a discretionary sale-in-error ground at the certificate holder’s request. (35 ILCS 200/21-310)
- federal-tax-lien-redemption — if the United States holds an interest the tax deed cannot eliminate, that is a discretionary sale-in-error ground. (35 ILCS 200/21-310)
- heirs-property — heirs and equitable owners are parties entitled to redeem and to take-notice; diligent record inquiry must locate them.
- Sale in error (state-specific): broad mandatory grounds (property not taxable, void lien, prior payment, double assessment, void description, official error, government-owned, military-extension owner) plus discretionary grounds (post-sale bankruptcy, substantial destruction of improvements, U.S. interest, unknown environmental contamination). Buyer is refunded the amount paid except the nonrefundable $80 fee, plus ordered interest/costs. (35 ILCS 200/21-310)
- Substantial destruction / contamination — improvements destroyed after sale, or undisclosed hazardous substances (excluding grease traps), are discretionary sale-in-error grounds. (35 ILCS 200/21-310)
- Tyler-equity / constitutional — post-bell-v-pappas-2025, any tax deed that captures equity far exceeding the tax debt is exposed to Takings/Excessive-Fines challenge pending HB4537 implementation.
10. Operations
- Where records live: county Treasurer/Collector (delinquency, sale, certificates), county Clerk (redemption, tax-judgment-sale-redemption-and- forfeiture record, tax deeds), Circuit Court (judgment & order of sale, tax-deed petitions, foreclosure), county Recorder (recorded deeds).
- Public portals: Illinois General Assembly statutes https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=596&ChapterID=8; Cook County Treasurer https://www.cookcountytreasurer.com; county clerk redemption desks (e.g., DuPage https://www.dupagecounty.gov).
- Typical costs: nonrefundable indemnity fee (80 + 5%** in Cook & 3M+ counties) (35 ILCS 200/21-295); plus statutory clerk/sheriff/ publication fees rolled into the certificate/redemption amount.
- Typical timelines: redemption 1–2.5 years (extendable to 3); tax-deed petition in the final months before redemption expires; mortgage foreclosure ~7+ months minimum to divest a homestead.
- Key agencies: County Treasurer/Collector; County Clerk; Circuit Court (county Chancery/Tax division); County Recorder.
- Useful forms: TAKE NOTICE forms (35 ILCS 200/22-10, 22-15); petition for tax deed (35 ILCS 200/22-30); sale-in-error petition (35 ILCS 200/21-310); indemnity petition (35 ILCS 200/21-305). (Form numbers vary by county.)
11. Meta
- sources:
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K21-350”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # redemption periods 21-350
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K21-355”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # redemption amount/penalty multipliers
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K21-385”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # 3-year extension cap
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K21-215”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # bid-down penalty, 9% max
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K21-310”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # sale in error
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K21-305”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # indemnity fund, 10-yr, caps
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K21-295”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # indemnity fee 80+5%, treasurer trustee
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=003502000K22-10”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # take-notice timing/contents
- {type: statute, url: “https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/fulltext?DocName=073500050K15-1512”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # mortgage sale proceeds/surplus
- {type: case, url: “https://ilcourtsaudio.blob.core.windows.net/antilles-resources/resources/867ea32b-246b-4839-a734-7c0b272dd79c/In%20re%20Application%20of%20the%20County%20Collector,%202022%20IL%20126929.pdf”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # 2022 IL 126929 full opinion
- {type: news, url: “https://www.legalnewsline.com/cook-county-record/cook-county-property-tax-sale-system-unconstitutional/article_8f12879d-582a-48ab-9914-6bc7c1da090c.html”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # Bell v. Pappas Dec 2025 ruling
- {type: news, url: “https://www.franczek.com/blog/federal-judge-rules-cook-county-tax-sale-system-unconstitutional/”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # Bell v. Pappas analysis (5th/8th Am)
- {type: news, url: “https://www.illinoispolicy.org/judge-rules-cook-county-tax-sale-illegal-lawmakers-yet-to-act/”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # Tyler reconciliation, Kennelly ruling
- {type: news, url: “https://capitolnewsillinois.com/news/property-tax-debt-sale-reform-will-allow-homeowners-to-keep-more-of-their-equity/”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # HB4537 reform 2026
- {type: news, url: “https://www.nprillinois.org/illinois/2026-05-31/property-tax-debt-sale-reform-will-allow-homeowners-to-keep-more-of-their-equity”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # HB4537 reform 2026
- {type: docket, url: “https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilndce/1:2022cv07061/424523”, retrieved: 2026-06-01} # Bell v. Pappas docket No. 1:22-cv-07061
- needs_verification:
- HB4537 enacted public-act number and effective date, and final text of the surplus-equity fund, extended redemption (~6 months), and revised tax-buyer fee schedule (Cook 5%+5%+20+$500). Reason: passed chambers May 2026, awaiting governor’s signature; only news sourcing retrieved.
- Annual tax sale max penalty rate (9% vs 18%): retrieved 21-355 full-text says “No bid shall be accepted for a penalty exceeding 9%”; many secondary sources and older statute versions say 18%. Reason: possible recent amendment vs. source-version mismatch; confirm against current certified statute.
- 21-350 redemption category structure (current 2.5-yr/1-yr text vs. historical 2-yr/2.5-yr/6-mo categories) and how HB4537’s 6-month extension modifies it. Reason: statute appears recently amended; need certified current text.
- Third-party recovery / finder fee cap, licensing, cooling-off, disclosure, prohibited practices for indemnity/surplus claims. Reason: not located in the Property Tax Code text retrieved; may live in a separate finder statute or HB4537.
- Tax-deed “merchantable title” exact cite (22-40/22-70) and the precise limitations period for direct/collateral attack on a tax-deed order.
- Statewide annual-sale timing window, registration/deposit rules, and platform vendors. Reason: county-specific; no single statewide official page retrieved.
- SCRA / minors / incompetents redemption tolling specifics.
- A dedicated verified redemption-holding Illinois appellate case (e.g., In re Application of the DuPage County Collector, 1998) — Justia/FindLaw returned 403; holding not independently confirmed from a retrieved primary source.
- open_questions:
- Will HB4537, once effective, reclassify Illinois as fully
reformed_post_Tyler, and will it apply retroactively to deeds issued in the prior 2 years (the surplus-equity fund covers recent losses)? - Does Bell v. Pappas extend beyond Cook County to all 102 counties as precedent?
- Post-reform: will a true former-owner surplus claim and recovery-agent market emerge (business-relevant for AuctionBlock)?
- Will HB4537, once effective, reclassify Illinois as fully
- cross_links: tyler-v-hennepin-county, bell-v-pappas-2025, county-collector-blossom63-2022, mullane-v-central-hanover, mennonite-v-adams, jones-v-flowers, right-of-redemption, surplus-funds, third-party-recovery-rules, due-process-notice, treasurer-sale, sheriff-sale, bankruptcy-automatic-stay, federal-tax-lien-redemption, heirs-property
- changelog:
- 2026-06-01 — initial autoresearch population from 35 ILCS 200, 735 ILCS 5 Art. XV, 2022 IL 126929, Bell v. Pappas (N.D. Ill.), and HB4537 reform coverage.
Disclaimer: This page is legal information, not legal advice. Tax-foreclosure law changes frequently; verify every fact against the cited primary sources and consult a licensed Illinois attorney before acting. Last verified: 2026-06-01.