USA Foreclosure Wiki

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) Protections in Tax and Mortgage Foreclosure

19 min read

Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) Protections in Tax and Mortgage Foreclosure

Reusable edge-case explainer. Legal information, not legal advice. Last verified: 2026-06-10.

The scenario

A property owner who is on active military duty — or who recently separated from service — faces a tax-lien sale, a tax-deed auction, or a mortgage foreclosure. Federal law imposes a web of procedural requirements, interest-rate caps, stay rights, and tolling rules that operate independently of (and often override) state procedure. Unlike the bankruptcy-automatic-stay, SCRA protections are not self-executing: most require the servicemember to affirmatively request relief. But the consequences of ignoring them fall squarely on the creditor, taxing authority, or court, and can invalidate a completed sale.

Key complications for surplus-fund recovery and title work:

  • A tax sale or mortgage foreclosure conducted without the required court order may be void or voidable, clouding title.
  • Redemption periods and state claim-filing deadlines are automatically tolled during active duty, potentially extending the window to claim surplus proceeds long after the sale.
  • The former owner of a foreclosed property who is (or was) a servicemember may have a later, longer deadline to petition a county for surplus-funds, or to bring a right-of-redemption claim, than a civilian former owner would have.

The controlling rules

1. Default judgment protection — 50 U.S.C. § 3931

Before any court may enter a default judgment against a defendant who has failed to appear, the plaintiff must file an affidavit stating (a) whether the defendant is in military service, or (b) that the plaintiff is unable to determine military status. 50 U.S.C. § 3931(b).

If the defendant appears to be in military service, the court:

  1. May not enter judgment until it appoints counsel to represent the servicemember. § 3931(b)(2). The appointed attorney’s acts do not waive the servicemember’s defenses if counsel cannot locate the client.
  2. Must grant a stay of at least 90 days when it appears that (a) a defense requires the servicemember’s presence, or (b) counsel is unable to contact the servicemember. § 3931(d).
  3. May require a bond in lieu of judgment when military status cannot be confirmed. § 3931(b)(3).

Reopening a default judgment — § 3931(g). A court may vacate a default judgment entered during the servicemember’s period of military service, or within 60 days after termination of or release from that service (§ 3931(g)(1)) if: (a) the servicemember was materially affected by military service in making a defense to the action, and (b) the servicemember has a meritorious or legal defense to the action or some part of it. The servicemember’s application to vacate must be filed not later than 90 days after the date of termination of or release from military service. § 3931(g)(2). Note the two separate time-windows: the 60-day window describes which judgments are eligible for reopening; the 90-day window is the deadline for filing the application itself.

Note: § 3931(c) is the criminal-penalty provision for false affidavits (fines under Title 18 or imprisonment up to one year) — a common subsection-reference error to avoid.

This section applies to judicial mortgage foreclosures and judicial tax-lien foreclosure actions alike — any civil proceeding where a defendant fails to appear.

Source: 50 U.S.C. § 3931 (LII, retrieved 2026-06-10); uscode.house.gov § 3931 (retrieved 2026-06-10).

2. Stay of proceedings — 50 U.S.C. § 3932

A servicemember who is a party to a civil court proceeding and whose current military duty requirements materially affect the ability to appear may apply to the court for a stay. Upon such application, the court shall stay the proceeding for not less than 90 days. 50 U.S.C. § 3932(b)(1).

The application must include:

  • A letter or other communication describing how duty requirements materially affect the servicemember’s ability to appear and a date when the servicemember will be available; and
  • A letter from the commanding officer confirming that military duty prevents appearance and that military leave is not authorized. § 3932(b)(2).

If the court refuses to grant an additional stay (i.e., beyond the initial stay), it must appoint counsel for the servicemember. § 3932(d)(2). Successive stays may be granted if military duties continue. Filing a stay application does not constitute an appearance for jurisdictional purposes or waive any substantive or procedural defense. § 3932(c).

Source: 50 U.S.C. § 3932 (LII, retrieved 2026-06-10).

3. Mortgage foreclosure prohibition — 50 U.S.C. § 3953

Scope — § 3953(a). Section 3953 applies to obligations on real or personal property owned by a servicemember that originated before the period of the servicemember’s military service and remain obligated, where the obligation is secured by a mortgage, trust deed, or other security in the nature of a mortgage.

Foreclosure/sale prohibition — § 3953(c). A sale, foreclosure, or seizure of property for breach of such an obligation is not valid if made during, or within one year after, the period of the servicemember’s military service, unless:

  • Made pursuant to a court order granted before the sale with a return approved by the court; or
  • The servicemember has provided a written waiver executed during or after the period of military service, as required by § 3918.

Court relief during proceedings — § 3953(b). In an action filed during, or within one year after, a servicemember’s period of military service to enforce such an obligation, the court may — and shall upon the servicemember’s application when military service materially affects the ability to comply — stay the proceedings for a period as justice and equity require, or adjust the obligation to preserve the interests of all parties.

Criminal penalty — § 3953(d). A person who knowingly makes or causes to be made a sale, foreclosure, or seizure prohibited by § 3953(c), or who knowingly attempts to do so, shall be fined as provided in Title 18 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

Note the timing trap: the protection only covers obligations that originated before the current period of service. An obligation that began during a prior service period does not automatically gain protection from a subsequent enlistment. See Sibert v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 16-1568 (4th Cir. July 17, 2017) (holding that a mortgage originated while plaintiff was in the Navy was not a protected obligation under § 3953(a) during a subsequent Army enlistment because the obligation did not originate “before” that later period of service).

needs_verification — Sibert reporter citation. The Fourth Circuit docket number 16-1568 and the July 17, 2017 decision date are confirmed from the court’s own URL at ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/161568.P.pdf. The commonly cited Federal Reporter citation “863 F.3d 331” could not be confirmed against a retrieved primary source (Justia and FindLaw returned 403 errors; the PDF was binary-only). The Supreme Court proceedings are confirmed as S.Ct. No. 17-566; the Court’s annotated note on the 4th Circuit’s own page reads “Dismissed by Supreme Court, January 5, 2018” — a dismissal, not a denial of certiorari. The “cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 1017 (2018)” formulation previously appearing on this page has been affirmatively removed as incorrect. The reporter citation “863 F.3d 331” and the specific page number remain unconfirmed pending access to the Federal Reporter; do not cite them as primary- source-verified.

Source: 50 U.S.C. § 3953 (LII, retrieved 2026-06-10); uscode.house.gov § 3953 (retrieved 2026-06-10); Sibert v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 16-1568 (4th Cir. July 17, 2017), docket confirmed at ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/161568.P.pdf (4th Cir. URL confirmed; Supreme Court dismissed, S.Ct. No. 17-566, Jan. 5, 2018; reporter citation needs_verification per note above).

4. Tax sale protection — 50 U.S.C. § 3991

Section 3991(a) applies when taxes or assessments on personal property (including motor vehicles) or real property used for dwelling, professional, business, or agricultural purposes fall due and remain unpaid before or during a servicemember’s period of military service.

Key protections:

a. Court-order requirement for tax sales — § 3991(b)(1). “Property may not be sold to enforce the collection of such tax or assessment except by court order and upon the determination by the court that military service does not materially affect the servicemember’s ability to pay.”

b. Stay of proceedings — § 3991(b)(2). “A court may stay a proceeding to enforce the collection of such tax or assessment, or sale of such property, during a period of military service of the servicemember and for a period not more than 180 days after the termination of, or release of the servicemember from, military service.”

c. Extended redemption — § 3991(c). “When property is sold or forfeited to enforce the collection of a tax or assessment, a servicemember shall have the right to redeem or commence an action to redeem the servicemember’s property during the period of military service or within 180 days after termination of or release from military service.” This right may not be shortened by state law.

d. Interest rate cap — § 3991(d). “Whenever a servicemember does not pay a tax or assessment on property when due, the amount of the tax or assessment due and unpaid shall bear interest until paid at the rate of 6 percent per year. An additional penalty or interest shall not be incurred by reason of nonpayment.”

e. Joint ownership — § 3991(e). The protections apply to property owned individually by the servicemember or jointly with a dependent.

Critical distinction: Unlike the mortgage foreclosure protection in § 3953, § 3991 does not contain an express automatic-void remedy for a tax sale conducted without court order — the statute is silent on the remedy for violation of § 3991(b)(1). The practical consequence (whether a non-compliant sale is void, voidable, or merely subject to a redemption right under § 3991(c)) depends on circuit and state court interpretation and is needs_verification for each jurisdiction. A tax-sale purchaser who buys without checking military status still risks a title challenge if the servicemember was not given the required court process; the § 3991(c) redemption right runs independently of whether the servicemember affirmatively raised it before the sale.

Source: 50 U.S.C. § 3991 (LII, retrieved 2026-06-10); uscode.house.gov § 3991 (retrieved 2026-06-10).

5. Tolling of statutes of limitation and redemption periods — 50 U.S.C. § 3936

Section 3936 provides automatic tolling — no hardship showing required.

§ 3936(a) — General limitations tolling. “The period of a servicemember’s military service may not be included in computing any period limited by law, regulation, or order for the bringing of any action or proceeding” in any court or government agency, by or against the servicemember or their estate.

§ 3936(b) — Redemption of real property. “A period of military service may not be included in computing any period provided by law for the redemption of real property sold or forfeited to enforce an obligation, tax, or assessment.”

§ 3936(c) — Federal tax exception. Section 3936 does not apply to periods of limitation under the federal internal revenue laws.

Source: 50 U.S.C. § 3936 (LII, retrieved 2026-06-10).

6. Storage and other liens — 50 U.S.C. § 3958

Section 3958 bars enforcement of storage, repair, cleaning, and other liens on a servicemember’s property during any period of military service and for 90 days thereafter without a prior court order. § 3958(a)(1). Courts may stay the proceeding or adjust the obligation when military service materially affects the servicemember’s ability to comply. § 3958(b). Knowing violation is a misdemeanor (fine under Title 18 or imprisonment up to one year, or both). § 3958(c).

In the tax-foreclosure context § 3958 is most relevant where a taxing authority has obtained a lien for municipal service charges or code-enforcement costs separate from the tax lien itself, and where personal property (vehicles, equipment) of the servicemember is at risk of auction. Section 3958 does not limit the protections of § 3953. § 3958(b).

Source: 50 U.S.C. § 3958 (LII, retrieved 2026-06-10); uscode.house.gov § 3958 (retrieved 2026-06-10).

Illustrative case

Conroy v. Aniskoff, 507 U.S. 511 (1993)

Facts. Conroy, an Army officer, failed to pay local real estate taxes on property in Danforth, Maine. The town sold the property and, after the statutory redemption period expired, recorded a tax deed. Conroy sued, arguing that § 525 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 — the predecessor to 50 U.S.C. § 3936 — tolled the redemption period during his active-duty service. The Maine courts required him to show that military service caused the hardship that excused inaction.

Holding. The Supreme Court unanimously reversed, holding that “the statutory command in § 525 is unambiguous, unequivocal, and unlimited.” A servicemember need not demonstrate that military service materially affected the ability to pay or to act within the normal time. The period of military service is excluded from the redemption calculation automatically. Congress “intended to protect all military personnel on active duty, not just those whose lives have been temporarily disrupted.” Conroy, 507 U.S. at 514–516.

Docket: No. 91-1353. Argued January 11, 1993; decided March 31, 1993.

Lesson for surplus-recovery and title work. If a servicemember’s property was sold at a tax auction while the owner was on active duty, the § 3936(b) tolling clock was paused for the entire period of service. The redemption window — including the window to challenge the sale or claim surplus — restarts only upon separation. No showing of prejudice is required. A title examiner or surplus- recovery agent must verify military status at the time of sale and calculate the extended deadline accordingly.

Source: Conroy v. Aniskoff, 507 U.S. 511 (1993) (Cornell SCOTUS archive, retrieved 2026-06-10).

State variation

Federal SCRA sets a floor; states may and do add protections on top of it. The table below covers the most significant additions encountered in surplus and foreclosure work. Jurisdiction pages carry the operative citations.

JurisdictionVariationCitation
CaliforniaCalifornia Military Families Financial Relief Act (Mil. & Vet. Code §§ 800–813) permits reservists called to active duty to defer mortgage payments and property-tax obligations on a primary residence for the lesser of the active-duty period + 60 days, or 180 days. § 804 bars non-judicial foreclosure and repossession during the deferral period unless otherwise ordered by a court or agreed to by the parties. Interest and penalties are capped at zero during the deferral.Cal. Mil. & Vet. Code §§ 800–813 (retrieved 2026-06-10)
All states — National GuardFederal SCRA applies when a Guard member is called to federal active duty (Title 10). State-only activations (Title 32) may or may not qualify; several states extend state SCRA-equivalents to cover all state activations. Check the relevant jurisdiction page.needs_verification — varies by state; check jurisdiction page
MassachusettsLand Court operates a separate “Servicemembers Cases” docket to resolve any SCRA cloud before completing a foreclosure. A foreclosing creditor must file with the Land Court to determine military status. The existence and operation of this docket is well-established practice in Massachusetts foreclosure procedure. Citation needs_verification: The specific Massachusetts statutory authority (likely Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 244 and/or Chapter 57 of the Acts of 1943) could not be confirmed against a retrieved primary source. The prior citation to Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 183, § 68 was affirmatively incorrect — that section concerns insurance-licensed mortgagees and is wholly unrelated to servicemembers or foreclosure procedure (confirmed 2026-06-02 by primary-source retrieval). Do not cite ch. 183, § 68 for this proposition.needs_verification — correct chapter and section unconfirmed; ch. 183 § 68 affirmatively removed as incorrect

Practical note

For a surplus-recovery agent whose former owner is (or was) a servicemember:

  1. Verify military status at the date of sale. Run the former owner through the DoD SCRA Centralized Verification Service at scra.dmdc.osd.mil. The search covers all branches and is free for the public and creditors.

  2. Calculate the tolled deadline. If the former owner was on active duty at the time of the tax sale or mortgage foreclosure, the state’s claim-filing deadline for surplus proceeds (and the right-of-redemption deadline) is tolled for the entire period of military service under § 3936. The clock resumes only upon discharge or release. No hardship showing is required under Conroy.

  3. The § 3991 180-day redemption window stacks on top. Even after the tolled period ends, the servicemember has an additional 180-day window under § 3991(c) within which to redeem or to challenge the sale. The longer of (a) the tolled state-law deadline or (b) the § 3991 180-day post-discharge period controls.

  4. Check if the tax sale required a court order. A tax sale conducted without the court-order process mandated by § 3991(b)(1) is procedurally defective. If the servicemember raises it, a court may void the sale or toll remedies. This affects both the buyer’s title and the surplus disbursement.

  5. The § 3932 stay vs. the bankruptcy-automatic-stay. Unlike the bankruptcy stay, the SCRA stay under § 3932 must be requested by the servicemember and is for a minimum of 90 days, not indefinite. A servicemember who is also in bankruptcy gets the benefit of both statutes, but they operate separately.

  6. Mortgage-foreclosure surplus. If a mortgage foreclosure sale was conducted without a court order during active duty or within one year after discharge (§ 3953(c)), the sale may be voidable. Any surplus distributed may need to be disgorged if the sale is later attacked. Flag this risk before filing a surplus claim and confirm the servicemember waived the § 3953 protection or that a court order was obtained.

  7. Check § 3931(g) eligibility carefully. A servicemember who seeks to vacate a default judgment must show: (a) the judgment was entered during service or within 60 days after termination (§ 3931(g)(1)), and (b) the application is filed within 90 days of discharge (§ 3931(g)(2)). Both windows run from different reference events — a missed 60-day window means the judgment is outside the reopening provision entirely.

right-of-redemption, bankruptcy-automatic-stay, surplus-funds, third-party-recovery-rules, due-process-notice

Sources

Changelog

DateChangeVerified via
2026-06-02Fix § 3931 subsection: Corrected ”§ 3931(c)(1)” to ”§ 3931(b)(2)” for the court-must-appoint-counsel requirement. § 3931(c) is the criminal-penalty provision for false affidavits — wholly different.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3931; uscode.house.gov § 3931
2026-06-02Remove wrong Massachusetts citation: Removed “Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 183, § 68” from the state-variation table — confirmed unrelated to servicemembers. Moved to needs_verification.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartII/TitleI/Chapter183/Section68
2026-06-02Sibert S.Ct. citation moved to needs_verification: Prior text cited “cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 1017 (2018)” — incorrect. Reporter “863 F.3d 331” unconfirmed.4th Cir. URL https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/161568.P.pdf
2026-06-02Adversarial review fix — § 3932 subsection corrections: Changed “initial stay” to “additional stay” for the § 3932(d)(2) counsel-appointment trigger; corrected appearance/waiver citation from § 3932(b)(2) to § 3932(c).law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3932
2026-06-02Adversarial review fix — § 3991 subsection letters corrected: Court-order requirement is (b)(1), stay is (b)(2), redemption is (c), interest-rate cap is (d).law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3991; uscode.house.gov § 3991
2026-06-10§ 3931(g) dual-window fix: Added the 60-day condition from § 3931(g)(1) (judgment must have been entered during service or within 60 days after termination to be eligible for reopening) — previously absent. The 90-day deadline in (g)(2) for filing the application was already correct but is now clearly distinguished from the (g)(1) eligibility window. Added practical note #7.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3931; uscode.house.gov § 3931, both retrieved 2026-06-10
2026-06-10Sibert S.Ct. disposition corrected: Prior needs_verification block incorrectly left open the possibility of “cert. denied.” Confirmed from 4th Circuit’s own PDF page annotation: Supreme Court dismissed the petition, S.Ct. No. 17-566, January 5, 2018. The “cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 1017 (2018)” formulation affirmatively removed. Reporter citation “863 F.3d 331” remains needs_verification (PDF binary-only; Justia/FindLaw 403).ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/161568.P.pdf (URL annotation); web search corroboration of S.Ct. No. 17-566, 2026-06-10
2026-06-10Added § 3953(a) scope clarification: Made express that § 3953(a) covers obligations “originated before the period of the servicemember’s military service” and added § 3953(b) (court-relief-during-proceedings) which was entirely absent from prior draft.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3953; uscode.house.gov § 3953, both retrieved 2026-06-10
2026-06-10Added § 3958 (storage and other liens): Entirely absent from prior page. Section 3958 bars lien enforcement during service and for 90 days after without court order; criminal penalty; expressly does not limit § 3953. Added as Section 6 with primary-source citations.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3958; uscode.house.gov § 3958, both retrieved 2026-06-10
2026-06-10Added § 3991(e) joint-ownership provision: Minor omission corrected. § 3991(e) extends protections to jointly-owned property.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3991, retrieved 2026-06-10
2026-06-10Added § 3918 waiver citation: The written-waiver exception in § 3953(c) already cited ”§ 3918” but § 3918 was not in the sources list. Added primary-source citation and confirmed § 3918 is the waiver provision (written instrument, separate from the underlying obligation, executed during or after service).law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3918, retrieved 2026-06-10
2026-06-10California MFFRA section range corrected: Prior text cited §§ 800–811; leginfo.legislature.ca.gov confirms the chapter runs §§ 800–813. Updated range throughout.leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=MVC&division=4.&chapter=3., retrieved 2026-06-10
2026-06-10gap_score computed and added to frontmatter. gap_score: 4 (4 × 1-point needs_verification items: Sibert reporter, MA statute, National Guard Title 32, § 3991 void/voidable remedy). No rows 3–5 deficiencies remain.2026-06-10 adversarial citation pass

Legal information, not legal advice. This page summarizes federal and selected state law as of the last_verified date and does not account for every circuit interpretation, local rule, or subsequent development. SCRA eligibility, the scope of active-duty periods, and the mechanics of state-law interaction are fact-specific. Consult a licensed attorney and/or a military legal assistance office before acting on any SCRA-related claim or defense.

Graph View

Backlinks